Literature DB >> 10024704

Computer use by general practitioners in Scotland.

H M Richards1, F M Sullivan, E D Mitchell, S Ross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread adoption by general practitioners (GPs) of desktop computers, there has been very little evaluation of the way in which the computer is actually used during consultations and the way in which it affects patient satisfaction. AIM: To ascertain the extent to which the computer is used in the consultation and to investigate the possible relationship between computer use and patient satisfaction.
METHOD: Six GPs completed a short questionnaire about the extent to which they use the computer during surgeries. Eighty-four consultations from the surgeries of these GPs were video recorded. Patient satisfaction data on these 84 patients were collected at the time of the surgery using the previously validated Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire.
RESULTS: All six GPs stated that they usually used the computer during consultations. However, video observation revealed that the computer was used in just 51% of surgeries. The proportion of time that the computer was used for varied from 0.03 to 0.4, with a mean value of 0.12. The commonest function for which the computer was used was prescribing. The consultations in which the computer was used (CU) were on average 148 seconds longer than the non-computerized consultations (NCU). There was no difference in patient satisfaction between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Despite this group of GPs having a self-declared interest in the use of computers, the extent to which the computer was used was much lower than expected from the GPs' self-reported use. This may be partly explained by the fact that using the computer takes up valuable time within the consultation and does not appear to contribute to patient satisfaction. If desktop computers are to be used to their full potential in general practice, more work is required to evaluate their impact on the consultation process itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10024704      PMCID: PMC1313193     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  10 in total

1.  Long to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice.

Authors:  J G Howie; A M Porter; D J Heaney; J L Hopton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Computerized protocol for preventive medicine: a controlled self-audit in family practice.

Authors:  M A Weingarten; D Bazel; H S Shannon
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Timer: a new objective measure of consultation content and its application to computer assisted consultations.

Authors:  M Pringle; S Robins; G Brown
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-07-05

Review 4.  Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports.

Authors:  F Sullivan; E Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-30

5.  Videotaping of general practice consultations: effect on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  L M Campbell; F Sullivan; T S Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-22

6.  The new information management and technology strategy of the NHS.

Authors:  M S Leaning
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-24

7.  Intruders in the consultation.

Authors:  F Sullivan
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners.

Authors:  G Herzmark; G Brownbridge; M Fitter; A Evans
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-12

9.  Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Computer assisted screening: effect on the patient and his consultation.

Authors:  M Pringle; S Robins; G Brown
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-06-08
  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Wilson; Susan Childs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  e-Prescribing, efficiency, quality: lessons from the computerization of UK family practice.

Authors:  Charles P Schade; Frank M Sullivan; Simon de Lusignan; Jean Madeley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.