Literature DB >> 10023876

Evaluation of vaginal introital sampling as an alternative approach for the detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.

M Domeika1, M Bassiri, I Butrimiene, A Venalis, J Ranceva, V Vasjanova.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women are traditionally detected by testing cervical and urethral samples. This sampling approach is not acceptable in some, e.g. screening situations. We evaluate an alternative approach, i.e. use of vaginal self-collected specimen for testing by polymerase chain reaction.
METHODS: The sensitivity of self-collected vaginal (introital) samples to diagnose genital infections by Chlamydia trachomatis using Roche AMPLICOR CT/NG PCR was compared with the cervical- and first-voided urine samples from women consulting with- (Group 1; n=123) and without (Group 0; n=160) genital symptoms. Women were interviewed regarding genital hygiene. Genital symptoms and signs were noted.
RESULTS: C. trachomatis DNA was detected in 13.0% of women from Group 1 and in 5.0% of women from Group 0, i.e. in urine of 6.5% vs. 1.9%, in the cervical swab in 9.8% vs. 5.0% and in vaginal swab in 11.4% vs. 3.8% of women, respectively. The vaginal sample was the most sensitive specimen for detecting C. trachomatis in the Group 1 women. It had sensitivity of 87.5% vs. 75% for cervical- and 50% for urine specimens. In Group 0, the cervical sample was 100% sensitive, while the vaginal introital sample and urine had a sensitivity of 75% and 37.5%, respectively. C. trachomatis was less often detected in urine of women who routinely practised genital washing.
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal sampling performed by the woman herself is a sensitive approach and might serve as an important stimulus for screening for C. trachomatis infections in young women at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10023876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  Diagnosing genitourinary chlamydial infection. Vaginal swabs alone may not be sufficient.

Authors:  M H Wilcox; D Subramanian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

2.  Acceptability of a self-sampling technique to collect vaginal smears for gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Boskey; Shelly A Atherly-Trim; Patricia J O'Campo; Donna M Strobino; Dawn P Misra; P Misra
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 3.  Chlamydial infections in urology.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Wolfgang Weidner; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Evaluation of a modified sanitary napkin as a sample self-collection device for the detection of genital chlamydial infection in women.

Authors:  M Alary; C Poulin; C Bouchard; M Fortier; G Murray; S Gingras; M Aubé; C Morin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, and trichomonas infections by self obtained low vaginal swabs, in remote northern Australian clinical practice.

Authors:  S C Garrow; D W Smith; G B Harnett
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Comparing first-void urine specimens, self-collected vaginal swabs, and endocervical specimens to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by a nucleic acid amplification test.

Authors:  Mary-Ann Shafer; Jeanne Moncada; Cherrie B Boyer; Kelli Betsinger; Scott D Flinn; Julius Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Self-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Carole Lunny; Darlene Taylor; Linda Hoang; Tom Wong; Mark Gilbert; Richard Lester; Mel Krajden; Gina Ogilvie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.