Literature DB >> 10022696

Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4 ng./ml. or less.

G F Carvalhal1, D S Smith, D E Mager, C Ramos, W J Catalona.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the detection rate of prostate cancer in men with suspicious digital rectal examination findings and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4 ng./ml. or less. We also evaluated the stage and grade of cancers detected.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We screened 22,513 community volunteers by PSA testing and digital rectal examination at 6-month intervals. Biopsy was recommended when either test was suspicious for cancer. In the subset of 2,703 white and black men in whom PSA was 4 ng./ml. or less and digital rectal examination was suspicious for prostate cancer we compared compliance with biopsy recommendations, cancer detection rates, and stage and grade of cancers detected. We then correlated these results with patient age, race and serum PSA concentration. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict cancer based on clinical characteristics, and evaluated the positive predictive value of digital rectal examination for detecting cancer as stratified by race and PSA.
RESULTS: Of the men 70% underwent biopsy with no difference in compliance according to age, race or PSA level. The 13% cancer detection rate correlated with age, race and PSA (p <0.003). The positive predictive value of a suspicious digital rectal examination was 5, 14 and 30% in men with PSA 0 to 1.0, 1.1 to 2.5 and 2.6 to 4.0 ng./ml., respectively. All cancers were clinically localized. Of the 72% of cases that were surgically staged 82% were organ confined and 78% were moderately differentiated.
CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive value of suspicious digital rectal examination was appreciable in men with low serum PSA. The majority of cancer cases detected by digital rectal examination had features of clinically important and potentially curable disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10022696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Individualized screening interval for prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen level: results of a prospective, randomized, population-based study.

Authors:  Gunnar Aus; Jan-Erik Damber; Ali Khatami; Hans Lilja; Johan Stranne; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-12

2.  Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

Review 3.  [Prostate biopsy. Update for indication, procedure, and future developments].

Authors:  S Machtens; A Roosen; C G Stief; M C Truß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  A 12-year follow-up of ANNA/C-TRUS image-targeted biopsies in patients suspicious for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Björn Grabski; Udo Paul; Leif Bäurle; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan So; Phillipe Violette; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Frédéric Bois; Camille Noirot; Sébastien Dietemann; Ismini C Mainta; Thomas Zilli; Valentina Garibotto; Martin A Walter
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  The role of empiric antibiotic treatment in preventing unnecessary prostate biopsies in asymptomatic patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/ml.

Authors:  Ali Saribacak; Hasan Yilmaz; Seyfettin Ciftci; Murat Ustuner; Levend Ozkan; Tayyar Alp Ozkan; Ozdal Dillioglugil
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 8.  [Transrectal ultrasound-guided punch biopsies of the prostate. Indication, technique, results, and complications].

Authors:  J Palisaar; T Eggert; M Graefen; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  [Validity of digital rectal examination in the era of prostate specific antigen].

Authors:  E Alonso-Sandoica; J Jara-Rascón; J I Martínez-Salamanca; C Hernández-Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 10.  [Examples of screening investigations].

Authors:  A Eickhoff; A Hahn; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.