Literature DB >> 9990689

A unified approach to the analysis of case-distribution (case-only) studies.

S Greenland1.   

Abstract

A number of new study designs have appeared in which the exposure distribution of a case series is compared to an exposure distribution representing a complete theoretical population or distribution. These designs include the case-genotype study, the case-cross-over study, and the case-specular study. This paper describes a unified likelihood-based approach to the analysis of such studies, and discusses extensions of these methods when a control group is available. The approach clarifies certain assumptions implicit in the methods, and helps contrast these assumptions to those underlying ordinary case-control studies. There are several reasons to expect discrepancies between ordinary case-control estimates and case-distribution estimates; for example, case-distribution estimates can be more sensitive to exposure misclassification. Some discrepancies are illustrated in an application to case-specular data on wire codes and childhood cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9990689     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990115)18:1<1::aid-sim961>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  15 in total

1.  Bias and efficiency in family-based gene-characterization studies: conditional, prospective, retrospective, and joint likelihoods.

Authors:  P Kraft; D C Thomas
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Overview of techniques to account for confounding due to population stratification and cryptic relatedness in genomic data association analyses.

Authors:  M J Sillanpää
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Natural history of diseases: Statistical designs and issues.

Authors:  Nicholas P Jewell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Mapping quantitative trait loci from a single-tail sample of the phenotype distribution including survival data.

Authors:  Mikko J Sillanpää; Fabian Hoti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  "First-wave" bias when conducting active safety monitoring of newly marketed medications with outcome-indexed self-controlled designs.

Authors:  Shirley V Wang; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Malcolm Maclure; Joshua J Gagne
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Exchangeability in the case-crossover design.

Authors:  Murray A Mittleman; Elizabeth Mostofsky
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Case-crossover analysis of condom use and herpes simplex virus type 2 acquisition.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Stanaway; Anna Wald; Emily T Martin; Sami L Gottlieb; Amalia S Magaret
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Risk of injury from drinking: the difference which study design makes.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye; Jason Bond; Timothy Stockwell; Kate Vallance; Gina Martin; Jeffrey R Brubacher; Andrew MacPherson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  The Case Time Series Design.

Authors:  Antonio Gasparrini
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Risk of injury due to alcohol: evaluating potential bias using the case-crossover usual-frequency method.

Authors:  Yu Ye; Jason Bond; Cheryl J Cherpitel; Tim Stockwell; Scott Macdonald; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.