Literature DB >> 9990626

A new defibrillator discrimination algorithm utilizing electrogram morphology analysis.

M R Gold1, W Hsu, A F Marcovecchio, M R Olsovsky, D J Lang, S R Shorofsky.   

Abstract

Inappropriate therapies delivered by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for supraventricular arrhythmias remain a common problem, particularly in the event of rapidly conducted atrial fibrillation or marked sinus tachycardia. The ability to differentiate between ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular arrhythmias is the major goal of discrimination algorithms. Therefore, we developed a new algorithm, SimDis, utilizing morphological features of the shocking electrograms. This algorithm was developed from electrogram data obtained from 36 patients undergoing ICD implantation. An independent test set was evaluated in 25 patients. Recordings were made in sinus rhythm, sinus tachycardia, and following the induction of ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. The arrhythmia complex is defined as wide if the duration is at least 30% greater than the template in sinus rhythm. For narrow complexes, four maximum and minimum values were measured to form a 4-element feature vector, which was compared with a representative feature vector during normal sinus rhythm. For each rhythm, any wide complex was classified as ventricular tachycardia. For narrow complexes, the second step of the algorithm compared the electrogram with the template, computing similarity and dissimilarity values. These values were then mapped to determine if they fell within a previously established discrimination boundary. On the independent test set, the SimDis algorithm correctly classified 100% of ventricular tachycardias (27/27), 98% of sinus tachycardias (54/55), and 100% of episodes of atrial fibrillation (37/37). We conclude that the SimDis algorithm yields high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (99%) for arrhythmia discrimination, using the computational capabilities of an ICD system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9990626     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00328.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

Review 1.  Strategic choices to reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related morbidity.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Methods of minimizing inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  B Schaer; S Osswald
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  A pilot study examining the performance of polynomial-modeled ventricular shock electrograms for rhythm discrimination in implantable devices.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Williams; Vladimir Shusterman; Samir Saba
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  A segmental polynomial model of ventricular electrograms as a simple and efficient morphology discriminator for implantable devices.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Williams; Vladimir Shusterman; Samir Saba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Optimal Programming of ICDs for Prevention of Appropriate and Inappropriate Shocks.

Authors:  Ronald Lo; Amin Al-Ahmad; Henry Hsia; Paul C Zei; Paul J Wang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.