Literature DB >> 9990597

Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a two-year follow-up.

S Greco1, A Auriti, D Fiume, G Gazzeri, G Gentilucci, L Antonini, M Santini.   

Abstract

Twenty-three patients affected by severe, refractory angina were submitted to permanent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and then followed in our outpatient clinic for 24 months. During the follow-up period, the number of weekly angina episodes drastically dropped from 9.2 (preimplant) to 1.8 in the 3rd, 2.5 in the 6th, 4.5 in the 12th, and 4.2 in the 24th month, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01) between the first and last values. A significant increase in the average exercise time from 320 +/- 120 seconds (in baseline condition) to 410 +/- 115 seconds (during SCS) was observed at the treadmill stress test (P < 0.01). SCS was well tolerated by all the patients. However, 7 patients died during follow-up (3 myocardial infarctions, 2 noncardiac deaths, and 2 sudden deaths). Three generators were replaced because of battery depletion after 15, 17, and 21 months. No serious complication was observed. In conclusion, in patients with otherwise intractable angina or already submitted to myocardial revascularization, SCS is very effective in reducing the number of angina episodes. The time of the work during exercise stress test is also significantly prolonged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9990597     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00296.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Angina Pectoris.

Authors:  Wilbert S. Aronow; William H. Frishman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-02

2.  Dorsal column stimulator applications.

Authors:  Claudio Yampolsky; Santiago Hem; Damián Bendersky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-31

Review 3.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Pan; Hongguang Bao; Yanna Si; Chenjie Xu; Hao Chen; Xianzhong Gao; Xinyi Xie; Yajie Xu; Fan Sun; Lingqing Zeng
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.442

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.