Literature DB >> 9990418

Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1% gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris, with particular reference to the onset of action and impact on quality of life.

E Grosshans1, R Marks, J M Mascaro, H Torras, J Meynadier, M Alirezai, A Y Finlay, P Soto, M Poncet, M Verschoore, A Clucas.   

Abstract

A randomized, multicentre, investigator-masked study was conducted in 105 patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris to compare the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1% gel with tretinoin 0.025% gel after three months of treatment, with particular emphasis on reduction in inflammatory lesion counts after one week of treatment and impact on quality of life. In terms of efficacy, adapalene gel was found to be superior to tretinoin gel after one week of treatment, with respect to reduction in inflammatory lesion counts (32% vs. 17%, respectively; P = 0.001), total lesion counts (28% vs. 22%, respectively; P = 0.042) and global severity grade (28% vs. 16%, respectively; P = 0.001). No significant difference between the two treatments was found after 12 weeks of treatment for any of these variables. Evaluation of facial skin tolerance parameters showed significant differences between the two treatments in favour of adapalene for dryness, erythema, immediate and persistent burning and pruritus for at least one time point. One patient in the adapalene group and three patients in the tretinoin group experienced medical events which lead to discontinuation of treatment (skin irritation; NS). Quality of life scores improved more rapidly in the adapalene group than in the tretinoin group, with significant differences (P < 0.05) appearing at week 1 for questions related to problems with partners, close friends or relatives and to skin symptoms. There was also a significantly greater improvement in social and leisure activity in the adapalene group at week 12. Adapalene 0.1% gel reduced inflammatory and total lesion counts more rapidly than tretinoin 0.025% gel, and was also better tolerated. These differences appear to result in an earlier and greater quality of life improvement for the patients receiving adapalene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9990418     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.1390s2026.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  9 in total

1.  Fighting the battle against breast cancer. So close and yet so far.

Authors:  E Warner
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Let's keep it alive and vibrant. Conversation with Rex Murphy. Interview by Barbara Kermode-Scott.

Authors:  R Murphy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Adapalene 0.3% for the treatment of acne in women.

Authors:  Diane Berson; Andrew Alexis
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-10

Review 4.  Current concepts of the pathogenesis of acne: implications for drug treatment.

Authors:  Harald Gollnick
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Transdermal penetration of topical drugs used in the treatment of acne.

Authors:  Andrea Krautheim; Harald Gollnick
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Adapalene: a review of its use in the treatment of acne vulgaris.

Authors:  John Waugh; Stuart Noble; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Minimal important difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): results from patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Authors:  Richard Shikiar; Gale Harding; Michael Leahy; Richard D Lennox
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  A review of the use of adapalene for the treatment of acne vulgaris.

Authors:  Suleyman Piskin; Erol Uzunali
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Acne-specific quality of life questionnaire (Acne-QoL): translation, cultural adaptation and validation into Brazilian-Portuguese language.

Authors:  Cristhine de Souza Leão Kamamoto; Karime Marques Hassun; Ediléia Bagatin; Jane Tomimori
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.