Literature DB >> 9989442

Loading during the stance phase of walking in humans increases the extensor EMG amplitude but does not change the duration of the step cycle.

M J Stephens1, J F Yang.   

Abstract

Prior work from mammals suggests that load experienced by extensor muscles of the hindlimbs (i.e. Duysens and Pearson 1980; Pearson and Collins 1993; Fouad and Pearson 1997) or cutaneous afferents from the plantar surface of the foot (Duysens and Pearson 1976; Guertin et al. 1995) enhances activity in extensor muscles during the stance phase, and delays the onset of flexor activity associated with the swing phase. The presumed functional significance of this phenomenon is that extensor activity of the supporting limb during walking can: (a) reinforce the supporting function in proportion to the load experienced, and (b) prolong the stance phase until unloading of the limb has occurred. Whether a similar functional role exists for load-sensitive afferents during walking in the human is unknown. In this study, the effect of adding or removing a substantial load (30% of body weight) at the centre of mass was studied in healthy adult human subjects. Loads were applied near the centre of mass to avoid the need for postural adjustments which might confound the interpretation of the results. Subjects walked on a treadmill with either: (a) a sustained increase or decrease in load, or (b) a sudden unexpected increase or decrease in load. In general, subjects responded to the changes in load by changing the amplitude of the extensor electromyographic (EMG) bursts. For example, with sudden unexpected additions in load, the average increase in amplitude was 40% for the soleus across the stance phase, and 134% for the quadriceps during the early part of the stance phase. Extensor EMGs increased with both sustained and sudden increases in load. Extensor EMG durations also increased (average increase in duration of 4% for soleus with sudden loading, and 7% for sustained loading). Cycle duration hardly changed (average increase of 0.5% with both sudden and sustained loading). These results differ from those of infants subjected to a similar perturbation during supported walking. A large change in timing (i.e. an increase in the duration of the stance phase by 30% and the step cycle by 28%) was seen in the infants, with no change in the amplitude of the EMG burst (Yang et al. 1998). These results suggest that the central nervous system can control the timing and amplitude of extensor EMG activity in response to loading independently. Maturation of the two components most likely occurs independently. In the adult, independent control of the two components may provide greater flexibility of the response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9989442     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

Review 1.  Spinal circuitry of sensorimotor control of locomotion.

Authors:  D A McCrea
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Could enhanced reflex function contribute to improving locomotion after spinal cord repair?

Authors:  K G Pearson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Spinal cats on the treadmill: changes in load pathways.

Authors:  Marie-Pascale Côté; Ariane Ménard; Jean-Pierre Gossard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Group I disynaptic excitation of cat hindlimb flexor and bifunctional motoneurones during fictive locomotion.

Authors:  J Quevedo; B Fedirchuk; S Gosgnach; D A McCrea
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Modulation of ankle muscle postural reflexes in stroke: influence of weight-bearing load.

Authors:  Daniel S Marigold; Janice J Eng; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Patterned control of human locomotion.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Yuri P Ivanenko; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Range of motion (ROM) restriction influences quipazine-induced stepping behavior in postnatal day one and day ten rats.

Authors:  Misty M Strain; Michele R Brumley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Common motor mechanisms support body load in serially homologous legs of cockroaches in posture and walking.

Authors:  Laura A Quimby; Ayman S Amer; Sasha N Zill
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Afferent-mediated modulation of the soleus muscle activity during the stance phase of human walking.

Authors:  Nazarena Mazzaro; Michael J Grey; Omar Feix do Nascimento; Thomas Sinkjaer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vertical perturbations of human gait: organisation and adaptation of leg muscle responses.

Authors:  V Bachmann; R Müller; H J A van Hedel; V Dietz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.