Literature DB >> 9989441

Effects of short-term adaptation of saccadic gaze amplitude on hand-pointing movements.

J Kröller1, J B De Graaf, C Prablanc, D Pélisson.   

Abstract

We investigated whether and how adaptive changes in saccadic amplitudes (short-term saccadic adaptation) modify hand movements when subjects are involved in a pointing task to visual targets without vision of the hand. An experiment consisted of the pre-adaptation test of hand pointing (placing the finger tip on a LED position), a period of adaptation, and a post-adaptation test of hand pointing. In a basic task (transfer paradigm A), the pre- and post-adaptation trials were performed without accompanying eye and head movements: in the double-step gaze adaptation task, subjects had to fixate a single, suddenly displaced visual target by moving eyes and head in a natural way. Two experimental sessions were run with the visual target jumping during the saccades, either backwards (from 30 to 20 degrees, gaze saccade shortening) or onwards (30 to 40 degrees, gaze saccade lengthening). Following gaze-shortening adaptation (level of adaptation 79+/-10%, mean and s.d.), we found a statistically significant shift (t-test, error level P<0.05) in the final hand-movement points, possibly due to adaptation transfer, representing 15.2% of the respective gaze adaptation. After gaze-lengthening adaptation (level of adaptation 92+/-17%). a non-significant shift occurred in the opposite direction to that expected from adaptation transfer. The applied computations were also performed on some data of an earlier transfer paradigm (B, three target displacements at a time) with gain shortening. They revealed a significant transfer relative to the amount of adaptation of 18.5< or = 17.5% (P<0.05). In the coupling paradigm (C), we studied the influence of gaze saccade adaptation of hand-pointing movements with concomitant orienting gaze shifts. The adaptation levels achieved were 59+/-20% (shortening) and 61+/-27% (lengthening). Shifts in the final fingertip positions were congruent with internal coupling between gaze and hand, representing 53% of the respective gaze-amplitude changes in the shortening session and 6% in the lengthening session. With an adaptation transfer of less than 20% (paradigm A and B), we concluded that saccadic adaptation does not "automatically" produce a functionally meaningful change in the skeleto-motor system controlling hand-pointing movements. In tasks with concomitant gaze saccades (coupling paradigm C), the modification of hand pointing by the adapted gaze comes out more clearly, but only in the shortening session.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9989441     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head.

Authors:  D Y P Henriques; W P Medendorp; C C A M Gielen; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Self-generated saccades do not modify the gain of adapted reactive saccades.

Authors:  Valérie Gaveau; Nadia Alahyane; Roméo Salemme; Michel Desmurget
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Two modes of error processing in reaching.

Authors:  Frederic Magescas; Christian Urquizar; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptation of reactive and voluntary saccades: different patterns of adaptation revealed in the antisaccade task.

Authors:  Julien Cotti; Muriel Panouilleres; Douglas P Munoz; Jean-Louis Vercher; Denis Pélisson; Alain Guillaume
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  How does saccade adaptation affect visual perception?

Authors:  Teresa D Hernandez; Carmel A Levitan; Martin S Banks; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Arm movement metrics influence saccade metrics when looking and pointing towards a memorized target location.

Authors:  Emmanouil Kattoulas; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Asimakis Mantas; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Vassilis Raos; Adonis Moschovakis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Unconstrained reaching modulates eye-hand coupling.

Authors:  Dongpyo Lee; Howard Poizner; Daniel M Corcos; Denise Y Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Saccadic-like visuomotor adaptation involves little if any perceptual effects.

Authors:  Damien Laurent; Olivier Sillan; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Reach adaptation to online target error.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; J Timothy Inglis; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Concurrent adaptation of reactive saccades and hand pointing movements to equal and to opposite changes of target direction.

Authors:  Valentina Grigorova; Otmar Bock; Steliana Borisova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.