G J Locksmith1, P Clark, P Duff. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We compared maternal and neonatal infection rates under 3 different group B streptococcal prevention strategies and also evaluated reasons for each protocol's failures in preventing neonatal disease. STUDY DESIGN: Women who were delivered at our center from August 1, 1991, through April 30, 1998, were managed by 1 of 3 protocols for prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection: a selective screening protocol, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists protocol, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended universal screening strategy. We compared maternal infection rates and neonatal group B streptococcal infection rates under each protocol. We also compared reasons for each protocol's failures in preventing neonatal infection. RESULTS: Clinical chorioamnionitis rates were 7.4% with selective screening, 7.7% under The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' protocol, and 5.2% with universal screening (relative risk 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8). Endometritis rates were 4.0% with selective screening, 4.6% with The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists protocol, and 2. 8% with universal screening (relative risk 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8). Overall neonatal group B streptococcal infection rates were lower under the 2 more recent strategies, but not significantly so. Despite the ability of universal screening to find more women at risk for group B streptococcal transmission, half of the neonatal infections under this protocol occurred when the mothers were not considered candidates for prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-endorsed universal screening strategy for group B streptococcal infection prevention was associated with significantly lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis and endometritis than were the other strategies. We were unable to document statistically significant improvement in neonatal outcome under the universal screening protocol.
OBJECTIVES: We compared maternal and neonatal infection rates under 3 different group B streptococcal prevention strategies and also evaluated reasons for each protocol's failures in preventing neonatal disease. STUDY DESIGN:Women who were delivered at our center from August 1, 1991, through April 30, 1998, were managed by 1 of 3 protocols for prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection: a selective screening protocol, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists protocol, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended universal screening strategy. We compared maternal infection rates and neonatal group B streptococcal infection rates under each protocol. We also compared reasons for each protocol's failures in preventing neonatal infection. RESULTS: Clinical chorioamnionitis rates were 7.4% with selective screening, 7.7% under The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' protocol, and 5.2% with universal screening (relative risk 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8). Endometritis rates were 4.0% with selective screening, 4.6% with The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists protocol, and 2. 8% with universal screening (relative risk 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8). Overall neonatal group B streptococcal infection rates were lower under the 2 more recent strategies, but not significantly so. Despite the ability of universal screening to find more women at risk for group B streptococcal transmission, half of the neonatal infections under this protocol occurred when the mothers were not considered candidates for prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-endorsed universal screening strategy for group B streptococcal infection prevention was associated with significantly lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis and endometritis than were the other strategies. We were unable to document statistically significant improvement in neonatal outcome under the universal screening protocol.
Authors: Margaret A Olsen; Anne M Butler; Denise M Willers; Gilad A Gross; Preetishma Devkota; Victoria J Fraser Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Jacques Saizonou; Laurent Ouédraogo; Moussiliou Noël Paraiso; Paul Ayélo; Alphonse Kpozèhouen; René Daraté; Esther Traoré Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2014-02-04