Literature DB >> 9987915

Microsatellite variation in the Australian dingo.

A N Wilton1, D J Steward, K Zafiris.   

Abstract

The dingo is thought to have arrived in Australia from Asia about 5,000 years ago. It is currently in danger because of interbreeding with domestic dogs. Several morphological, behavioral, and reproductive characteristics distinguish dingoes from domestic dog. Skull morphometrics are currently used to try to classify wild canids as pure dingo, dog, or hybrid. Molecular techniques based on diagnostic DNA differences between dogs and dingoes would make a much more reliable and practical test. A small number of markers (about 10) would allow detection of animals with domestic dog in their ancestry several generations back. We have typed 16 dingoes and 16 dogs of mixed breed for 14 microsatellites. The amount of variation in the Australian dingo is much less than in domestic dogs. The size distributions of microsatellites in the two groups usually overlap. The number of alleles in the dingo is much smaller in all cases. One dinucleotide repeat locus shows a size difference of 1 bp in allele classes between dog and dingo. This locus may be diagnostic for dog or dingo ancestry. The differences in distributions of alleles at other loci can also be used to classify animals using a likelihood method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9987915     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/90.1.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  9 in total

1.  Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid areas with experimentally deployed dingo scents.

Authors:  Michael H Parsons; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Narrow genetic basis for the Australian dingo confirmed through analysis of paternal ancestry.

Authors:  Arman Ardalan; Mattias Oskarsson; Christian Natanaelsson; Alan N Wilton; Afshin Ahmadian; Peter Savolainen
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Genetic variation analysis of the Bali street dog using microsatellites.

Authors:  Dawn N Irion; Alison L Schaffer; Sherry Grant; Alan N Wilton; Niels C Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 4.  Phylogenetic studies of dogs with emphasis on Japanese and Asian breeds.

Authors:  Yuichi Tanabe
Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.493

5.  Elucidating biogeographical patterns in Australian native canids using genome wide SNPs.

Authors:  Kylie M Cairns; Laura M Shannon; Janice Koler-Matznick; J William O Ballard; Adam R Boyko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Conservation implications for dingoes from the maternal and paternal genome: Multiple populations, dog introgression, and demography.

Authors:  Kylie M Cairns; Sarah K Brown; Benjamin N Sacks; J William O Ballard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Conservation concerns associated with low genetic diversity for K'gari-Fraser Island dingoes.

Authors:  G C Conroy; R W Lamont; L Bridges; D Stephens; A Wardell-Johnson; S M Ogbourne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated.

Authors:  J William O Ballard; Chloe Gardner; Lucille Ellem; Sonu Yadav; Richard I Kemp
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.734

9.  The Australian dingo: untamed or feral?

Authors:  J William O Ballard; Laura A B Wilson
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.