S Lunn1, F Crawley, M J Harrison, M M Brown, S P Newman. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University College London Medical School, Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The extent to which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) influences cognitive functioning has been the subject of a number of studies often with conflicting conclusions. This paper systematically reviews the literature in an attempt to clarify this issue. RESULTS: Although the majority of studies (16/28) reported an improvement in cognition after surgery, a substantial minority (12/28) found no change. Studies before 1984 tended to report an improvement, while later studies tended to report no change in cognition. Cognitive improvement was also more likely the longer the time interval between CEA and assessment. The studies were found to differ on many methodological factors, e.g. sample size, type of patient and control group, severity and side of carotid stenosis, the range of cognitive tests and timing of postoperative assessment. CONCLUSION: Given the conflicting findings, and the methodological issues, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion regarding the impact of carotid endarterectomy upon cognition. Future research which pays attention to these methodological factors is needed in order to adequately resolve the current debate.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The extent to which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) influences cognitive functioning has been the subject of a number of studies often with conflicting conclusions. This paper systematically reviews the literature in an attempt to clarify this issue. RESULTS: Although the majority of studies (16/28) reported an improvement in cognition after surgery, a substantial minority (12/28) found no change. Studies before 1984 tended to report an improvement, while later studies tended to report no change in cognition. Cognitive improvement was also more likely the longer the time interval between CEA and assessment. The studies were found to differ on many methodological factors, e.g. sample size, type of patient and control group, severity and side of carotid stenosis, the range of cognitive tests and timing of postoperative assessment. CONCLUSION: Given the conflicting findings, and the methodological issues, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion regarding the impact of carotid endarterectomy upon cognition. Future research which pays attention to these methodological factors is needed in order to adequately resolve the current debate.
Authors: Eric J Heyer; Ruchey Sharma; Anita Rampersad; Christopher J Winfree; William J Mack; Robert A Solomon; George J Todd; Paul C McCormick; James G McMurtry; Donald O Quest; Yaakov Stern; Ronald M Lazar; E Sander Connolly Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2002-02
Authors: D Lythgoe; A Simmons; A Pereira; M Cullinane; S Williams; H S Markus Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: I Q Grunwald; T Supprian; M Politi; T Struffert; P Falkai; C Krick; M Backens; W Reith Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2006-04-07 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: H Saito; K Ogasawara; H Nishimoto; Y Yoshioka; T Murakami; S Fujiwara; M Sasaki; M Kobayashi; K Yoshida; Y Kubo; T Beppu; A Ogawa Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Iris Quasar Grunwald; Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Wolfgang Reith; Martin Backens; Tilman Supprian; Maria Politi; Verena Vedder; K Zercher; B Muscalla; Anton Haass; Christoph M Krick Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Amani M Norling; Randolph S Marshall; Marykay A Pavol; George Howard; Virginia Howard; David Liebeskind; John Huston; Brajesh K Lal; Thomas G Brott; Ronald M Lazar Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2019-01-19 Impact factor: 2.931