Literature DB >> 9973235

Inactivation of the purified bovine mu opioid receptor by sulfhydryl reagents.

T L Gioannini1, I Onoprishvili, J M Hiller, E J Simon.   

Abstract

We have investigated the role of cysteine residues in a highly purified mu opioid receptor protein (muORP) by examining the effect of -SH reagents on the binding of opioid ligands. Treatment of muORP, which is devoid of additional proteins, eliminates complications that arise from reaction of -SH reagents with other components, such as G proteins. Reagents tested include N-ethylmaleimide, 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic) acid, and two derivatives of methanethiosulfonate. Specific opioid binding was inactivated by micromolar concentrations of all -SH reagents tested. Agonist binding ([3H]DAMGO) was much more sensitive to inactivation than antagonist binding ([3H]bremazocine). Prebinding muORP with 100 nM naloxone protected antagonist and agonist binding from inactivation by -SH reagents. The results of these experiments strongly suggest that at least one, and possibly more, reactive cysteine residue(s) is present on the mu opioid receptor protein molecule, positioned near the ligand binding site and accessible to -SH reagents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9973235     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020923928936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochem Res        ISSN: 0364-3190            Impact factor:   3.996


  25 in total

1.  Kinetics of opiate receptor inactivation by sulfhydryl reagents: evidence for conformational change in presence of sodium ions.

Authors:  E J Simon; J Groth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential effects of protein-modifying reagents on receptor binding of opiate agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  G W Pasternak; H A Wilson; S H Snyder
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Functional reconstitution of a highly purified mu-opioid receptor protein with purified G proteins in liposomes.

Authors:  L Q Fan; T L Gioannini; T Wolinsky; J M Hiller; E J Simon
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.372

4.  Protection of opiate receptors in NG108-15 against modification by N-ethylmaleimide.

Authors:  D Mullikin-Kilpatrick; N E Larsen; A J Blume
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sulfhydryl groups on opioid receptors revisited. Evidence for two sulfhydryl groups at or near the active site of the mu opioid receptor.

Authors:  D Ofri; E J Simon
Journal:  Receptor       Date:  1992

6.  Acetylcholine receptor channel structure probed in cysteine-substitution mutants.

Authors:  M H Akabas; D A Stauffer; M Xu; A Karlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Stereospecific binding of the potent narcotic analgesic (3H) Etorphine to rat-brain homogenate.

Authors:  E J Simon; J M Hiller; I Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Characterization of solubilized opioid receptors: reconstitution and uncoupling of guanine nucleotide-sensitive agonist binding.

Authors:  D Ofri; A M Ritter; Y F Liu; T L Gioannini; J M Hiller; E J Simon
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.372

9.  Purification of an active opioid-binding protein from bovine striatum.

Authors:  T L Gioannini; A D Howard; J M Hiller; E J Simon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-12-05       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Amino acid residues lining the chloride channel of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator.

Authors:  M H Akabas; C Kaufmann; T A Cook; P Archdeacon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-05-27       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Opioid receptor desensitization: mechanisms and its link to tolerance.

Authors:  Stéphane Allouche; Florence Noble; Nicolas Marie
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.810

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.