Literature DB >> 9972573

Discrimination of musical instrument sounds resynthesized with simplified spectrotemporal parameters.

S McAdams1, J W Beauchamp, S Meneguzzi.   

Abstract

The perceptual salience of several outstanding features of quasiharmonic, time-variant spectra was investigated in musical instrument sounds. Spectral analyses of sounds from seven musical instruments (clarinet, flute, oboe, trumpet, violin, harpsichord, and marimba) produced time-varying harmonic amplitude and frequency data. Six basic data simplifications and five combinations of them were applied to the reference tones: amplitude-variation smoothing, coherent variation of amplitudes over time, spectral-envelope smoothing, forced harmonic-frequency variation, frequency-variation smoothing, and harmonic-frequency flattening. Listeners were asked to discriminate sounds resynthesized with simplified data from reference sounds resynthesized with the full data. Averaged over the seven instruments, the discrimination was very good for spectral envelope smoothing and amplitude envelope coherence, but was moderate to poor in decreasing order for forced harmonic frequency variation, frequency variation smoothing, frequency flattening, and amplitude variation smoothing. Discrimination of combinations of simplifications was equivalent to that of the most potent constituent simplification. Objective measurements were made on the spectral data for harmonic amplitude, harmonic frequency, and spectral centroid changes resulting from simplifications. These measures were found to correlate well with discrimination results, indicating that listeners have access to a relatively fine-grained sensory representation of musical instrument sounds.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9972573     DOI: 10.1121/1.426277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Acoustic structure of the five perceptual dimensions of timbre in orchestral instrument tones.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Liberty S Hamilton; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Robert S Kang; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Auditory and cognitive performance in elderly musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Massimo Grassi; Chiara Meneghetti; Enrico Toffalini; Erika Borella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Auditory salience using natural soundscapes.

Authors:  Nicholas Huang; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Music in our ears: the biological bases of musical timbre perception.

Authors:  Kailash Patil; Daniel Pressnitzer; Shihab Shamma; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.