Literature DB >> 9971899

Ultrasonography in suspected acute appendicitis in childhood-report of 1285 cases.

B Schulte1, D Beyer, C Kaiser, S Horsch, A Wiater.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For the assessment of the diagnostic value of real-time ultrasonography (US) in children with suspected acute appendicitis (a.A.) the results of graded compression US are compared with clinical and histological final diagnoses.
METHODS: In a prospective study over nearly 9 years we examined 1285 children aged 1-15 years (m=514, f=771). Using a 5-MHz curved array transducer the right lower quadrant was examined in a graded compression technique.
RESULTS: Prevalence of histologically proven a.A. was remarkably low (9%). In diagnosis of acute appendicitis in childhood US achieves a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 90% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The overall accuracy was 98%. Mesenteric lymphadenitis was seen in 181 cases (prevalence 12%) and terminal ileitis occasionally accompanied by mesenteric lymphadenitis was seen in 116 cases (prevalence 9%).
CONCLUSION: In children with suspected appendicitis US of the abdomen gives great diagnostical value for differential diagnosis of a.A. and other more frequent inflammatory diseases of the ileocoecal region. Thus US provides further reliable information to the referring physician. Consequently it is necessary to perform US in each child with acute abdominal pain, even if clinical diagnosis seems to be well established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9971899     DOI: 10.1016/s0929-8266(98)00075-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ultrasound        ISSN: 0929-8266


  9 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. ... or US versus CT? A European perspective.

Authors:  Herma C Holscher; Hugo A Heij
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-02-03

2.  Characteristics of mesenteric lymphadenitis in comparison with those of acute appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Itai Gross; Yael Siedner-Weintraub; Shir Stibbe; David Rekhtman; Daniel Weiss; Natalia Simanovsky; Dan Arbell; Saar Hashavya
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging - which is preferred for acute appendicitis in children? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanfei Zhang; Meiyan Liao; Jie Chen; Dongyong Zhu; Sama Byanju
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04

4.  Revised ultrasound criteria for appendicitis in children improve diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Adam B Goldin; Paritosh Khanna; Mahesh Thapa; Jennifer A McBroom; Michelle M Garrison; Marguerite T Parisi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-03-16

5.  The impact of diagnostic delay on the course of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  V C Cappendijk; F W Hazebroek
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  [Acute appendicitis. Modern diagnostics--surgical ultrasound].

Authors:  M Binnebösel; J Otto; M Stumpf; A H Mahnken; N Gassler; V Schumpelick; S Truong
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Clinical and laboratory methods in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Mojca Groselj-Grenc; Stane Repse; Dubravka Vidmar; Metka Derganc
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Identifying threshold sizes for enlarged abdominal lymph nodes in different age ranges from about 200,000 individual's data.

Authors:  Lili He; Yinghua Sun; Guoying Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reference intervals of mesenteric lymph node size according to lymphocyte counts in asymptomatic children.

Authors:  Baohuan Cai; Huiming Yi; Wei Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.