Literature DB >> 996552

Low-risk cigarettes: a prescription.

G B Gori.   

Abstract

Antismoking education campaigns in out society have met with only partial success: today 55 to 60 million Americans smoke, and the habit is increasing among teenagers and women. It is important to protect individuals who continue to smoke despite all warnings. There is evidence that this can be accomplished in at least two ways. First, it may be possible to remove toxic smoke components and thus reduce specific hazards. Second, the doseresponse evidence suggests that, if the total intake of smoke can be reduced, after an appropriate time a reduction in disease incidence should occur. The technology to achieve these results has been developed and can be applied to the manufacture of commercial cigarettes. These cigarettes will not conform to traditional flavour patterns, but consumer perception can be made to change and compensating flavours and fragrances can be added. The feasibility of less hazardous cigarettes raises the question of whether there are limits of cigarette and smoke composition that may approach relative safety. These limits can be defined as the smoke intake doses at which the risk of disease in smokers approaches that in nonsmokers. Such values can be extimated by dose-response analysis of several epidemiological studies and by extrapolation of blood concentrations at different rates of intake for certain smoke components, such as carbon monoxide. Critical values determined by these methods should not be interpreted as indicators of safe smoking levels; they do imply, however, that a rapid shift in cigarette consumption habits toward the proposed range of values will make possible a substantial reduction in the current epidemic proportions of smoking-related diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 996552     DOI: 10.1126/science.996552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  13 in total

1.  News media coverage of smoking and health is associated with changes in population rates of smoking cessation but not initiation.

Authors:  J P Pierce; E A Gilpin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Estimating the health consequences of replacing cigarettes with nicotine inhalers.

Authors:  W Sumner
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. III. A reanalysis of the nicotine regulation hypothesis.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; S T Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in cigarette smokers.

Authors:  P B Murthy
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields of some Nigerian cigarettes.

Authors:  A A Awotedu; T W Higenbottam; B O Onadeko
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Chromosomal aberrations in heavy smokers.

Authors:  G Obe; J Herha
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1978-04-24       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Health risks to women who smoke.

Authors:  G W Piper
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) in industry trial testimony.

Authors:  Geoffrey Ferris Wayne
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Concentration of mutagens from urine by absorption with the nonpolar resin XAD-2: cigarette smokers have mutagenic urine.

Authors:  E Yamasaki; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Nicotine fading and self-monitoring for cigarette abstinence or controlled smoking.

Authors:  R M Foxx; R A Brown
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1979
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.