PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to delineate the natural history of the progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS: In a 10-year period, 1701 carotid arteries in 1004 patients who were asymptomatic were studied with serial duplex scans (mean follow-up period, 28 months; mean number of scans, 2.9/patient). At each visit, stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the external carotid artery (ECA) were categorized as none (0 to 14%), mild (15% to 49%), moderate (50% to 79%), severe (80% to 99%), preocclusive, or occluded. Progression was defined as an increase in ICA stenosis to >/=50% for carotid arteries with a baseline of <50% or as an increase to a higher category of stenosis if the baseline stenosis was >/=50%. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The risk of progression of ICA stenosis increased steadily with time (annualized risk of progression, 9.3%). With multivariate modeling, the four most important variables that affected the progression (P <.02) were baseline ipsilateral ICA stenosis >/=50% (relative risk [RR], 3.34), baseline ipsilateral ECA stenosis >/=50% (RR, 1.51), baseline contralateral ICA stenosis >/=50% (RR, 1.41), and systolic pressure more than 160 mm Hg (RR, 1. 37). Ipsilateral neurologic ischemic events (stroke/transient ischemic attack) occurred in association with 14.0% of the carotid arteries that were studied. The progression of ICA stenosis correlated with these events (P <.001), but baseline ICA stenosis was not a significant predictor. CONCLUSION: In contrast to recently published studies, we found that the risk of progression of carotid stenosis is substantial and increases steadily with time. Baseline ICA stenosis was the most important predictor of the progression, but baseline ECA stenosis also was identified as an important independent predictor. Contralateral ICA stenosis and systolic hypertension were additional significant predictors. We found further that the progression of ICA stenosis correlated with ischemic neurologic events but not baseline stenosis. The data provide justification for the use of serial duplex scans to follow carotid stenosis and suggest that different follow-up intervals may be appropriate for different patient subgroups.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to delineate the natural history of the progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS: In a 10-year period, 1701 carotid arteries in 1004 patients who were asymptomatic were studied with serial duplex scans (mean follow-up period, 28 months; mean number of scans, 2.9/patient). At each visit, stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the external carotid artery (ECA) were categorized as none (0 to 14%), mild (15% to 49%), moderate (50% to 79%), severe (80% to 99%), preocclusive, or occluded. Progression was defined as an increase in ICA stenosis to >/=50% for carotid arteries with a baseline of <50% or as an increase to a higher category of stenosis if the baseline stenosis was >/=50%. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The risk of progression of ICA stenosis increased steadily with time (annualized risk of progression, 9.3%). With multivariate modeling, the four most important variables that affected the progression (P <.02) were baseline ipsilateral ICA stenosis >/=50% (relative risk [RR], 3.34), baseline ipsilateral ECA stenosis >/=50% (RR, 1.51), baseline contralateral ICA stenosis >/=50% (RR, 1.41), and systolic pressure more than 160 mm Hg (RR, 1. 37). Ipsilateral neurologic ischemic events (stroke/transient ischemic attack) occurred in association with 14.0% of the carotid arteries that were studied. The progression of ICA stenosis correlated with these events (P <.001), but baseline ICA stenosis was not a significant predictor. CONCLUSION: In contrast to recently published studies, we found that the risk of progression of carotid stenosis is substantial and increases steadily with time. Baseline ICA stenosis was the most important predictor of the progression, but baseline ECA stenosis also was identified as an important independent predictor. Contralateral ICA stenosis and systolic hypertension were additional significant predictors. We found further that the progression of ICA stenosis correlated with ischemic neurologic events but not baseline stenosis. The data provide justification for the use of serial duplex scans to follow carotid stenosis and suggest that different follow-up intervals may be appropriate for different patient subgroups.
Authors: Verónica Fernández-Alvarez; Fernando López; Carlos Suárez; Primoz Strojan; Avraham Eisbruch; Carl E Silver; William M Mendenhall; Johannes A Langendijk; Alessandra Rinaldo; Anne W M Lee; Jonathan J Beitler; Robert Smee; Javier Alvarez; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Eli Lechtman; Indranil Balki; Kiersten Thomas; Kevin Chen; Alan R Moody; Pascal N Tyrrell Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Parveen K Garg; Willam J H Koh; Joseph A Delaney; Ethan A Halm; Calvin H Hirsch; William T Longstreth; Kenneth J Mukamal; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Joseph F Polak; Lesley Curtis Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Extra Date: 2016-11-16