Literature DB >> 9950522

Analysis and treatment of severe trigonocephaly.

R J Havlik1, D J Azurin, S P Bartlett, L A Whitaker.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of seven patients with clinically severe trigonocephaly was performed, including a review of preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans. A method of analyzing the trigonocephalic deformity was developed. This is based on determination of the angular severity of the forehead (110 +/- 4 degrees) and the length of half of the supraorbital bar (40 +/- 3 mm). This central angle was found to be relatively constant in this population. Using simple trigonometric relationships, a rationale for the alternative method of reconstruction used in these patients is presented. This technique is based on transverse expansion of the supraorbital bar, transposition of the lateral orbital rim, expansion of the temporal fossa, and recontouring the orbital aperture. As a separate consideration and step, the bony interorbital distance is widened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9950522     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Little evidence of association between severity of trigonocephaly and cognitive development in infants with single-suture metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Starr; H Jill Lin; Salvador Ruiz-Correa; Michael L Cunningham; Richard G Ellenbogen; Brent R Collett; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Personalized Optimal Planning for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Antonio R Porras; D Zukic; A Equobahrie; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Clin Image Based Proced       Date:  2016-09-21

3.  "Validation of Artificial Intelligence Severity Assessment in Metopic Craniosynostosis".

Authors:  Alexandra Junn; Jacob Dinis; Sacha C Hauc; Madeleine K Bruce; Kitae E Park; Wenzheng Tao; Cameron Christensen; Ross Whitaker; Jesse A Goldstein; Michael Alperovich
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-11-17

4.  Non-syndromic trigonocephaly: surgical decision making and long-term cosmetic results.

Authors:  Michael O Kelleher; Dylan J Murray; Anne McGillivary; Mahmoud H Kamel; David Allcutt; Michael J Earley
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Jacques van der Meulen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Trigonocephaly: A simple modified technique.

Authors:  Danish Mohammad; Sivashanmugam Dhandapani
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2014-05

Review 7.  Review of Past Reports and Current Concepts of Surgical Management for Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Shigeo Kyutoku; Takayuki Inagaki
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Practical Computed Tomography Scan Findings for Distinguishing Metopic Craniosynostosis from Metopic Ridging.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Carrie L Heike; Faisal Al-Mufarrej; Adam Oppenheimer; Shawn E Kamps; Widya Adidharma; Babette Siebold
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-03-14

9.  Effectiveness of Automatic Planning of Fronto-orbital Advancement for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  David García-Mato; Antonio R Porras; Santiago Ochandiano; Gary F Rogers; Roberto García-Leal; José I Salmerón; Javier Pascau; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-11-11

10.  Combating Constraints of the Functional Matrix: The Importance of Overcorrection in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas T K Do; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.