Literature DB >> 9950177

Defining the microbiological quality of dialysis fluid.

I Ledebo1, R Nystrand.   

Abstract

With increasing awareness about the degree and the potential impact of microbiological contamination in dialysis fluids, there is a desire to improve their microbiological quality. To achieve this goal, the origin of the microbiological contamination has to be identified. The water, the bicarbonate concentrate, and the fluid distribution system can be major contributors. Regular disinfection of the entire fluid path is necessary to prevent the formation of biofilm. The bicarbonate concentrate should be handled with special attention because it constitutes an excellent growth medium for microflora that may not be detected with regular assays. With a well maintained reverse osmosis (RO) system, frequent disinfection of the entire flow path, and microbiological awareness, it is possible to produce dialysis fluid that meets the most stringent standard (<10(2) colony forming units (CFU)/ml and <0.25 IU/ml of endotoxin). Adding a step of ultrafiltration just before the dialyzer can make the dialysis fluid ultrapure (<10(-1) CFU/ ml and <0.03 IU/ml). One additional step of controlled ultrafiltration provides sterile and pyrogen-free fluids (<10(-6) CFU/ml and <0.03 IU/ml) that can be used for infusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9950177     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06275.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  8 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary evaluation for severity of hazards applied to hemodialysis devices: an original risk analysis method.

Authors:  Carlo Alberto Lodi; Alessandro Vasta; Maria Alquist Hegbrant; Juan P Bosch; Francesco Paolini; Francesco Garzotto; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Hemodialysis and water quality.

Authors:  Angela D Coulliette; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Clinical impact of kidney function on presepsin levels.

Authors:  Takanobu Nagata; Yoshinari Yasuda; Masahiko Ando; Tomoko Abe; Takayuki Katsuno; Sawako Kato; Naotake Tsuboi; Seiichi Matsuo; Shoichi Maruyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of Bacteriological and Chemical Quality of Dialysis Water and Fluid in Isfahan, Central Iran.

Authors:  Ali Shahryari; Mahnaz Nikaeen; Maryam Hatamzadeh; Marzieh Vahid Dastjerdi; Akbar Hassanzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Haemodiafiltration-optimal efficiency and safety.

Authors:  Ingrid Ledebo; Peter J Blankestijn
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2009-11-05

6.  Ultrapure dialysis fluid: a new standard for contemporary hemodialysis.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Paungpaga Lertdumrongluk
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2012-06-20

7.  Resistance to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in patients treated with online hemodiafiltration and ultrapure low-flux hemodialysis: results from a randomized controlled trial (CONTRAST).

Authors:  Neelke C van der Weerd; Claire H Den Hoedt; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel L Bots; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Renée Lévesque; Albert H A Mazairac; Menso J Nubé; E Lars Penne; Pieter M ter Wee; Muriel P C Grooteman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of improving quality of dialysis fluid on oxidative stress and lipid profile in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Driss Elkabbaj; Abdelali Bahadi; Yahia Cherrah; Mourad Errasfa; Rachid Eljaoudi
Journal:  ISRN Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.