Literature DB >> 9949628

Surface marker abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes.

M T Elghetany1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal stem cell disorders associated with a variety of abnormalities of mature and maturing cells, including surface antigen abnormalities. Granulocytes and monocytes function as members of the immune system. Surface antigens serve as biological sensors allowing various cells to interact with different stimuli. Abnormalities of surface antigens may be associated with defective cell function and may indicate a more severe or more advanced stage of the disease. INFORMATION SOURCES: The author has a great interest in bone marrow changes in MDS and has several previous publications in this field. In addition, relevant articles published since 1966 were retrieved using Medline of English literature and were included. STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES: Several surface antigens in MDS have shown abnormal expression either in the intensity of fluorescence or the percentage of positive cells. These abnormalities include increased, decreased or lineage-aberrant expression. Abnormalities of several surface markers have prognostic significance. MDS patients with a low percentage of bone marrow cells expressing CD11b had a higher risk of evolution to acute myeloid leukemia and shorter survival compared to patients with more than 53% of marrow cells expressing CD11b (29 weeks versus 160 weeks). On the other hand, an increased percentage of bone marrow cells expressing early or immature markers, such as CD 13, CD33, CD34 and HLA-DR, has been associated with a worse outcome and with progression to a higher risk MDS or to acute myeloid leukemia. However, there are numerous discrepancies and inconsistencies in the literature when reviewing surface marker changes in MDS. These discrepancies may be related, at least in part, to the presence of an intracellular storage compartment of numerous surface antigens in the granulocytes and monocytes. Because of these storage pools, the techniques of preparing more mature granulocytes and monocytes, such as density gradient separation, and the interpretation of results must be carefully evaluated. Furthermore, various methods have been used to express abnormal results including percentage of positive or negative cells, fluorescent intensity (FI) of individual patients or a group of patients using a mean fluorescent channel (256 or 1024 channel mode), and finally the expression of FI as molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochromes or antibody binding capacities. Several mechanisms may be involved in the abnormal expression of surface antigens in MDS including defective granulopoiesis, defective intracellular storage pool, abnormal membrane of cytoplasmic granules, and the effect of high levels of marrow cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and transforming growth factor-beta. Standardization of the methods of preparing and studying mature and maturing granulocytes and monocytes in MDS has to be achieved in order to produce comparable results, thus allowing surface marker studies to be utilized as diagnostic and prognostic tools in MDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9949628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  8 in total

1.  Flow cytometric study of neutrophilic granulopoiesis in normal bone marrow using an expanded panel of antibodies: correlation with morphologic assessments.

Authors:  M Tarek Elghetany; Yimin Ge; Jyoti Patel; Joe Martinez; Hanna Uhrova
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996).

Authors:  Peter L Greenberg; Zhuoxin Sun; Kenneth B Miller; John M Bennett; Martin S Tallman; Gordon Dewald; Elisabeth Paietta; Richard van der Jagt; Jessie Houston; Mary L Thomas; David Cella; Jacob M Rowe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Multicentric study underlining the interest of adding CD5, CD7 and CD56 expression assessment to the flow cytometric Ogata score in myelodysplastic syndromes and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Valérie Bardet; Orianne Wagner-Ballon; Julien Guy; Céline Morvan; Camille Debord; Franck Trimoreau; Emmanuel Benayoun; Nicolas Chapuis; Nicolas Freynet; Cédric Rossi; Stéphanie Mathis; Marie-Pierre Gourin; Andréa Toma; Marie C Béné; Jean Feuillard; Estelle Guérin
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Infections in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Andréa Toma; Pierre Fenaux; François Dreyfus; Catherine Cordonnier
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Immunotherapy for myeloid leukemias: current status and future directions.

Authors:  K el-Shami; B D Smith
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Lactate Exposure Promotes Immunosuppressive Phenotypes in Innate Immune Cells.

Authors:  Rapeepat Sangsuwan; Bhasirie Thuamsang; Noah Pacifici; Riley Allen; Hyunsoo Han; Svetlana Miakicheva; Jamal S Lewis
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.321

7.  Azacitidine for treatment of imminent relapse in MDS or AML patients after allogeneic HSCT: results of the RELAZA trial.

Authors:  U Platzbecker; M Wermke; J Radke; U Oelschlaegel; F Seltmann; A Kiani; I-M Klut; H Knoth; C Röllig; J Schetelig; B Mohr; X Graehlert; G Ehninger; M Bornhäuser; C Thiede
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  The Effects of Human BDH2 on the Cell Cycle, Differentiation, and Apoptosis and Associations with Leukemia Transformation in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Yang; Sheng-Fung Lin; Shu-Chen Wang; Wan-Chi Tsai; Chun-Chieh Wu; Shih-Chi Wu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.