Literature DB >> 99458

Intracortical connectivity of architectonic fields in the somatic sensory, motor and parietal cortex of monkeys.

E G Jones, J D Coulter, S H Hendry.   

Abstract

Anterograde and retrograde transport methods were used to study the corticocortical connectivity of areas 3a, 3b, 1, 2, 5, 4 and 6 of the monkey cerebral cortex. Fields were identified by cytoarchitectonic features and by thalamic connectivity in the same brains. Area 3a was identified by first recording a short latency group I afferent evoked potential. Attempts were made to analyze the data in terms of: (1) routes whereby somatic sensory input might influence the performance of motor cortex neurons; (2) possible multiple representations of the body surface in the component fields of the first somatic sensory area (SI). Apart from vertical interlaminar connections, two types of intracortical connectivity are recognized. The first, regarded as "non-specific," consists of axons spreading out in layers I, III and V-VI from all sides of an injection of isotope; these cross architectonic borders indiscrimininately. They are not unique to the regions studied. The second is formed by axons entering the white matter and re-entering other fields. In these, they terminate in layers I-IV in one or more mediolaterally oriented strips of fairly constant width (0.5--1 mm) and separated by gaps of comparable size. Though there is a broadly systematic topography in these projections, the strips are probably best regarded as representing some feature other than receptive field position. Separate representations are nevertheless implied in area 3b, in areas 1 and 2 (together), in areas 3a and 4 (together) and in area 5; with, in each case, the representations of the digits pointed at the central sulcus. Area 3b is not connected with areas 3a or 4, but projects to a combined areas 1 and 2. Area 1 is reciprocally connected with area 3a and area 2 reciprocally with area 4. The connectivity of area 3a, as conventionally identified, is such that it is probably best regarded not as an entity, but as a part of area 4. Areas identified by others as area 3a should probably be regraded as parts of area 3b. Parts of area 5 that should be more properly considered as area 2, and other parts that receive thalamic input not from the ventrobasal complex but from the lateral nuclear complex and anterior pulvinar, are also interconnected with area 4. More posterior parts of area 5 are connected with laterally placed parts of area 6. A more medial part of area 6, the supplementary motor area, occupies a pivotal position in the sensory-motor cortex, for it receives fibers from areas 3a, 4, 1, 2 and 5 (all parts), and projects back to areas 3a, 4 and 5.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 99458     DOI: 10.1002/cne.901810206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  181 in total

1.  Activation of multiple cortical areas in response to somatosensory stimulation: combined magnetoencephalographic and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Korvenoja; J Huttunen; E Salli; H Pohjonen; S Martinkauppi; J M Palva; L Lauronen; J Virtanen; R J Ilmoniemi; H J Aronen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Sources on the anterior and posterior banks of the central sulcus identified from magnetic somatosensory evoked responses using multistart spatio-temporal localization.

Authors:  M X Huang; C Aine; L Davis; J Butman; R Christner; M Weisend; J Stephen; J Meyer; J Silveri; M Herman; R R Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Short-latency peripheral inputs to thalamic neurones projecting to the motor cortex in the monkey.

Authors:  R N Lemon; J van der Burg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical activation during rhythmic hand movements performed under three types of control: an fMRI study.

Authors:  R A Bernard; D A Goran; S T Sakai; T H Carr; D McFarlane; B Nordell; T G Cooper; E J Potchen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Regional cerebral blood flow correlations of somatosensory areas 3a, 3b, 1, and 2 in humans during rest: a PET and cytoarchitectural study.

Authors:  Jeremy P Young; Stefan Geyer; Christian Grefkes; Katrin Amunts; Patricia Morosan; Karl Zilles; Per E Roland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Corticocortical connections of cat primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  H D Schwark; H Esteky; E G Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Exploring the cortical evidence of a sensory-discrimination process.

Authors:  Ranulfo Romo; Adrián Hernández; Antonio Zainos; Carlos Brody; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Discharge properties of neurones in the hand area of primary somatosensory cortex in monkeys in relation to the performance of an active tactile discrimination task. II. Area 2 as compared to areas 3b and 1.

Authors:  S A Ageranioti-Bélanger; C E Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Somatosensory areas engaged during discrimination of steady pressure, spring strength, and kinesthesia.

Authors:  Anna Bodegård; Stefan Geyer; Priyantha Herath; Christian Grefkes; Karl Zilles; Per E Roland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Connectivity of somatosensory cortical area 1 forms an anatomical substrate for the emergence of multifinger receptive fields and complex feature selectivity in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).

Authors:  Mária Ashaber; Emese Pálfi; Robert M Friedman; Cory Palmer; Balázs Jákli; Li Min Chen; Orsolya Kántor; Anna W Roe; László Négyessy
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.