Literature DB >> 9935111

Value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in the prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment.

L Engmann1, P Sladkevicius, R Agrawal, J S Bekir, S Campbell, S L Tan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether ovarian stromal blood flow velocity after pituitary suppression is predictive of ovarian response and the outcome of IVF treatment in patients with normal basal serum FSH levels and to compare the predictive value of this test with age, early follicular phase serum FSH level, E2 level, and FSH:LH ratio.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study of women undergoing IVF treatment.
SETTING: A tertiary referral center for assisted reproduction. PATIENT(S): Eighty-eight women who received the long buserelin acetate treatment protocol. INTERVENTION(S): Transvaginal color and pulsed Doppler measurement of the ovarian stromal peak systolic velocity (PSV) after pituitary suppression and measurement of the basal serum FSH level, E2 level, and FSH:LH ratio. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of mature oocytes retrieved and pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): Ovarian stromal PSV was the most important single independent predictor of ovarian response in patients with a normal basal serum FSH level, when compared with age, basal FSH level, E2 level, or FSH:LH ratio. Patients in group 2 (PSV > or = 10 cm/s) had a significantly higher median number of mature oocytes retrieved (11 versus 5.5) and a higher clinical pregnancy rate (35.3% versus 11.3%) than patients in group 1 (PSV <10 cm/s), even after controlling for age. CONCLUSION(S): Ovarian stromal blood flow velocity, after pituitary suppression is confirmed, is predictive of ovarian responsiveness and the outcome of IVF treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9935111     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00406-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  Antral follicle counting in predicting the retrieved oocyte number after ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Y Y Hsieh; C C Chang; H D Tsai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Mean ovarian diameter (MOD) as a predictor of poor ovarian response.

Authors:  Iavor K Vladimirov; Desislava M Tacheva; Krassimir B Kalinov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Power Doppler ultrasound assessment of follicular vascularity in the early follicular phase and its relationship with outcome of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S M Shrestha; M F Costello; P Sjoblom; G McNally; M Bennett; S J Steigrad; G J Hughes
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The significance of antral follicle size prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian response in a multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Qiaohong Lai; Cai Chen; Zhijun Zhang; Shu Zhang; Qilin Yu; Ping Yang; Jun Hu; Cong-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-01-15

Review 5.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Evaluation of ovarian reserve in infertile patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Fırat Mutlu; Ahmet Erdem
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01

7.  "One-Stop" fertility assessment using advanced ultrasound technology.

Authors:  M Hrehorcak; G Nargund
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

8.  Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve.

Authors:  William E Roudebush; Wendy J Kivens; Jessica M Mattke
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2008-04-16

9.  Prediction and diagnosis of poor ovarian response: the dilemma.

Authors:  Ahmed Badawy; Alaa Wageah; Mohamed El Gharib; Ezz Eldin Osman
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2011-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.