Literature DB >> 9935004

Sudden death in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: clinical context, arrhythmic events and device responses.

L A Pires1, M H Lehmann, R T Steinman, J J Baga, C D Schuger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the nature of terminal events and potential contributory clinical and nonclinical (e.g., device-related) factors associated with sudden death (SD) in recipients of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
BACKGROUND: The ICD is very effective in terminating ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), but protection against SD is not absolute. Little is known about the nature and potential causes of SD in patients with ICDs.
METHODS: We analyzed 25 cases of out-of-hospital SD among patients enrolled in the clinical investigation of the Cadence Tiered-Therapy Defibrillator System.
RESULTS: All patients (24 men and 1 woman, mean age 62+/-10 years) received epicardial lead systems. The majority (92%) had coronary artery disease and a previous myocardial infarction (MI), with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction 0.25+/-0.07. At device implantation, the mean defibrillation threshold was 13+/-5 J. Sudden death occurred 13+/-11 months later. Twenty patients (80%) had received appropriate ICD therapies before death, and 18 (72%) were receiving > or = 1 antiarrhythmic drugs at the time of death. Sudden death was tachyarrhythmia-associated in 16 patients (64%), non-tachyarrhythmia-associated in 7 (28%) and indeterminate in 2 (8%). In the 16 patients with tachyarrhythmia-associated SD, the overall first therapy success rate in tachycardia and fibrillation zones was 60% and 67%, respectively. However, despite protracted therapies (> or = 2 shocks) in 7 (66%) of 12 patients who received fibrillation therapies, the final tachyarrhythmic episode was ultimately terminated by the ICD in 15 (94%) of the 16 patients, whereas 1 patient died after multiple (initially successful) internal and external shocks for intractable VT/VF during exercise. In 10 patients (40%) one or more, primarily clinical, factors potentially contributory to SD were identified: heart failure (n=8), angina (n=2), hypokalemia (n=1), adverse antiarrhythmic drug treatment (n=1) and acute MI (n=1). An additional 10 patients (40%) had experienced an increase in frequency of ICD shocks within 3 months of SD. Appropriate battery voltages and normal circuitry function were found in all devices interrogated and analyzed after death.
CONCLUSIONS: In this select group of patients receiving a third-generation ICD, SD was associated with VT or VF events in nearly two-thirds of patients, and death occurred despite ultimately successful, although often protracted, device therapies. These observations, along with evidence of recent worsening clinical status, suggest acute cardiac mechanical dysfunction as a frequent terminal factor. In recipients with ICDs, SD directly attributable to device failure seems to be rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9935004     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00519-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  12 in total

Review 1.  Electrical storm in patients with an implanted defibrillator: a matter of definition.

Authors:  Carsten W Israel; S Serge Barold
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Myocardial stunning following defibrillation threshold testing.

Authors:  Michael Mollerus; Leslee Naslund
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  [Electrical storm: definition, prevalence, causes and prognostic implications].

Authors:  Carsten W Israel; Johannes C Manegold
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-01

4.  Sports participation in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  R Lampert; B Olshansky
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2012-06

5.  National experience with long-term use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Madhab Lamichhane; Joseph C Gardiner; Nicole R Bianco; Steven J Szymkiewicz; Ranjan K Thakur
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Role of omega-3 ethyl ester concentrate in reducing sudden cardiac death following myocardial infarction and in management of hypertriglyceridemia: an Indian consensus statement.

Authors:  J J Dalal; R R Kasliwal; A L Dutta; J P S Sawhney; S S Iyengar; S Dani; N Desai; I Sathyamurthy; D Rao; A Menon; A Dasbiswas; G S Wander; M Chadha; M S Hiremath; D G Roy; V Gupta; N Shivakadaksham
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-08-27

7.  Weather and triggering of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Jennifer L Nguyen; Francine Laden; Mark S Link; Joel Schwartz; Heike Luttmann-Gibson; Douglas W Dockery
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 8.  Noninvasive risk stratification after myocardial infarction: rationale, current evidence and the need for definitive trials.

Authors:  Derek Exner
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Defibrillation testing of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: when, how, and by whom?

Authors:  Luis A Pires
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2007-08-01

10.  Risk factors and prognostic role of an electrical storm in patients after myocardial infarction with an implanted ICD for secondary prevention.

Authors:  Wojciech Kwaśniewski; Artur Filipecki; Michał Orszulak; Witold Orszulak; Dagmara Urbańczyk; Robert Roczniok; Maria Trusz-Gluza; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.