M Demirbaş1, A Ergen, H Ozkardeş. 1. Department of Urology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of stone size, chemical structure, radiologic appearance, stone weight and stone mineral density on in vitro stone fragility. METHODS: A total of 216 stones obtained by open surgery were stratified according to their size, chemical structure (X-ray crystallography), radiologic appearance, mineral content and density (dual photon absorptiometry) and weight. Stone fragility was measured by the number of shock waves needed to completely fragment the stones in a phantom model by Dornier. RESULTS: Stone weight increased according to stone size and mineral density varied in relation to chemical composition. The radiologic appearance was not predictive of the chemical content. The most significant variable to predict the number of shock waves needed for full fragmentation was the stone weight. The stone weight could be formulated as a function of mineral content and the equation had statistical significance (p = 0.000). The necessary number of shock waves for complete disintegration also could be estimated by using stone weight, stone size and mineral density. This equation was also statistically significant (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Stone weight which is a function of stone mineral content seems to be the single most important parameter to predict stone fragility in vitro. Stone weight can be estimated by using the stone mineral content. Prediction of the necessary number of shock waves for full fragmentation seems possible and is formulated into an equation that proved to be statistically significant in vitro. In vivo application of this estimation awaits further research.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of stone size, chemical structure, radiologic appearance, stone weight and stone mineral density on in vitro stone fragility. METHODS: A total of 216 stones obtained by open surgery were stratified according to their size, chemical structure (X-ray crystallography), radiologic appearance, mineral content and density (dual photon absorptiometry) and weight. Stone fragility was measured by the number of shock waves needed to completely fragment the stones in a phantom model by Dornier. RESULTS: Stone weight increased according to stone size and mineral density varied in relation to chemical composition. The radiologic appearance was not predictive of the chemical content. The most significant variable to predict the number of shock waves needed for full fragmentation was the stone weight. The stone weight could be formulated as a function of mineral content and the equation had statistical significance (p = 0.000). The necessary number of shock waves for complete disintegration also could be estimated by using stone weight, stone size and mineral density. This equation was also statistically significant (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Stone weight which is a function of stone mineral content seems to be the single most important parameter to predict stone fragility in vitro. Stone weight can be estimated by using the stone mineral content. Prediction of the necessary number of shock waves for full fragmentation seems possible and is formulated into an equation that proved to be statistically significant in vitro. In vivo application of this estimation awaits further research.