Literature DB >> 9934618

Early gamma response is sensory in origin: a conclusion based on cross-comparison of results from multiple experimental paradigms.

S Karakaş1, E Başar.   

Abstract

The study investigates the functional correlates of the early, time-locked gamma response. The study utilized a unique experimental strategy which involved the utilization of a series of experimental paradigms to which all subjects (n = 20) were exposed to in the same recording session. These paradigms induced an increasingly complex configuration of processes for their respective task performance and also required different levels of attention allocation. In their order of administration, the paradigms were single stimulus (SS), mismatch negativity (MMN), evoked potential (EP), easy oddball (OB-EZ) and hard oddball (OB-HD). Auditory stimuli were used in the study (10 ms r/f time, 50 ms duration, 65 dB SPL) with the standards as 1000 Hz or 1900 Hz and deviants as 2000 Hz. The early gamma showed a frontocentral topography. The difference between Fz and Pz recording sites were statistically significant. A comparative analysis of the gamma responses showed that the gamma that was obtained at the early time-window of 0-150 ms as a time-locked activity occurred irrespective of experimental paradigm; the early gamma did not vary with the degree of task complexity or with attentional allocation. It was concluded from these findings that the early gamma is basically a sensory phenomenon. Various studies have previously shown that under perceptual/cognitive tasks, gamma response is obtained as a non-phase-locked activity in the late time-windows. These studies concluded that the gamma response is basically perceptual/cognitive in function. However, in these studies the early sensory gamma was also present in the data. Collectively taken, these findings may lead to the conclusion that the gamma response is a multifunctional phenomenon, with the early portion representing sensory and the late portion perceptual/cognitive processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9934618     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(98)00030-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  16 in total

1.  Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models.

Authors:  C Haenschel; T Baldeweg; R J Croft; M Whittington; J Gruzelier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Salience in a social landscape: electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant and infrequent vocal change.

Authors:  Ana P Pinheiro; Carla Barros; João Pedrosa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Durk Talsma; Christoph S Herrmann; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Gamma and beta neural activity evoked during a sensory gating paradigm: effects of auditory, somatosensory and cross-modal stimulation.

Authors:  Michael A Kisley; Zoe M Cornwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Communication call-evoked gamma-band activity in the auditory cortex of awake bats is modified by complex acoustic features.

Authors:  Andrei V Medvedev; Jagmeet S Kanwal
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Sensory gating impairments in heavy cannabis users are associated with altered neural oscillations.

Authors:  Chad R Edwards; Patrick D Skosnik; Adam B Steinmetz; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Auditory sensory gating in the neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion model of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jenifer L Vohs; R Andrew Chambers; Giri P Krishnan; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick; Samuel T Kaiser; Sarah Berg; Sandra L Morzorati
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.328

8.  Anticipation of natural stimuli modulates EEG dynamics: physiology and simulation.

Authors:  Ingo Fründ; Jeanette Schadow; Niko A Busch; Nicole Naue; Ursula Körner; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Effect of initiation-inhibition and handedness on the patterns of the P50 event-related potential component: a low resolution electromagnetic tomography study.

Authors:  Ion N Beratis; Andreas Rabavilas; Eleni D Nanou; Chrissanthi Hountala; Argiro E Maganioti; Christos N Capsalis; George N Papadimitriou; Charalabos Papageorgiou
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Coding of visual object features and feature conjunctions in the human brain.

Authors:  Jasna Martinovic; Thomas Gruber; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.