Literature DB >> 9934530

Factors affecting the diffusion of online end user literature searching.

J S Ash1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify factors that affect diffusion of usage of online end user literature searching. Fifteen factors clustered into three attribute sets (innovation attributes, organizational attributes, and marketing attributes) were measured to study their effect on the diffusion of online searching within institutions.
METHODS: A random sample of sixty-seven academic health sciences centers was selected and then 1,335 library and informatics staff members at those institutions were surveyed by mail with electronic mail follow-up. Multiple regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The survey yielded a 41% response rate with electronic mail follow-up being particularly effective. Two dependent variables, internal diffusion (spread of diffusion) and infusion (depth of diffusion), were measured. There was little correlation between them, indicating they measured different things. Fifteen independent variables clustered into three attribute sets were measured. The innovation attributes set was significant for both internal diffusion and infusion. Significant individual variables were visibility for internal diffusion and image enhancement effects (negative relation) as well as visibility for infusion (depth of diffusion). Organizational attributes were also significant predictors for both dependent variables. No individual variables were significant for internal diffusion. Communication, management support (negative relation), rewards, and existence of champions were significant for infusion. Marketing attributes were not significant predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful diffusion of online end user literature searching is dependent on the visibility of the systems, communication among, rewards to, and peers of possible users who promote use (champions). Personal image enhancement effects have a negative relation to infusion, possibly because the use of intermediaries is still seen as the more luxurious way to have searches done. Management support also has a negative relation to infusion, perhaps indicating that depth of diffusion can increase despite top-level management actions.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9934530      PMCID: PMC226524     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  11 in total

1.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations.

Authors:  J R Kimberly; M J Evanisko
Journal:  Acad Manage J       Date:  1981-12

2.  Physical therapists in private practice: information sources and information needs.

Authors:  E F Hall
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1995-04

3.  Information retrieval patterns and needs among practicing general surgeons: a statewide experience.

Authors:  K R Shelstad; F W Clevenger
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1996-10

Review 4.  Advances in the study of diffusion of innovation in health care organizations.

Authors:  A L Greer
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1977

5.  Information-seeking practices of dental hygienists.

Authors:  S L Gravois; W Fisher; D M Bowen
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1995-10

6.  Adoption of information technology enabled innovations by primary care physicians: model and questionnaire development.

Authors:  D R Dixon; B J Dixon
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

7.  Information needs in office practice: are they being met?

Authors:  D G Covell; G C Uman; P R Manning
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Can primary care physicians' questions be answered using the medical journal literature?

Authors:  P N Gorman; J Ash; L Wykoff
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1994-04

9.  Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered.

Authors:  P N Gorman; M Helfand
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Use of MEDLINE by physicians for clinical problem solving.

Authors:  D A Lindberg; E R Siegel; B A Rapp; K T Wallingford; S R Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Jun 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Expediting the transfer of evidence into practice: building clinical partnerships.

Authors:  T Rader; A J Gagnon
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-07

2.  Revision of BMLA information for authors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1999-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.