Literature DB >> 9933586

Structural basis for the differential toxicity of cholera toxin and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin. Construction of hybrid toxins identifies the A2-domain as the determinant of differential toxicity.

C Rodighiero1, A T Aman, M J Kenny, J Moss, W I Lencer, T R Hirst.   

Abstract

Cholera toxin (Ctx) and E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin (Etx) are structurally and functionally similar AB5 toxins with over 80% sequence identity. When their action in polarized human epithelial (T84) cells was monitored by measuring toxin-induced Cl- ion secretion, Ctx was found to be the more potent of the two toxins. Here, we examine the structural basis for this difference in toxicity by engineering a set of mutant and hybrid toxins and testing their activity in T84 cells. This revealed that the differential toxicity of Ctx and Etx was (i) not due to differences in the A-subunit's C-terminal KDEL targeting motif (which is RDEL in Etx), as a KDEL to RDEL substitution had no effect on cholera toxin activity; (ii) not attributable to the enzymatically active A1-fragment, as hybrid toxins in which the A1-fragment in Ctx was substituted for that of Etx (and vice versa) did not alter relative toxicity; and (iii) not due to the B-subunit, as the replacement of the B-subunit in Ctx for that of Etx caused no alteration in toxicity, thus excluding the possibility that the broader receptor specificity of EtxB is responsible for reduced activity. Remarkably, the difference in toxicity could be mapped to a 10-amino acid segment of the A2-fragment that penetrates the central pore of the B-subunit pentamer. A comparison of the in vitro stability of two hybrid toxins, differing only in this 10-amino acid segment, revealed that the Ctx A2-segment conferred a greater stability to the interaction between the A- and B-subunits than the corresponding segment from Etx A2. This suggests that the reason for the relative potency of Ctx compared with Etx stems from the increased ability of the A2-fragment of Ctx to maintain holotoxin stability during uptake and transport into intestinal epithelia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9933586     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.7.3962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  18 in total

1.  Transfer of the cholera toxin A1 polypeptide from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol is a rapid process facilitated by the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation pathway.

Authors:  Ken Teter; Rebecca L Allyn; Michael G Jobling; Randall K Holmes
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Role of ubiquitination in retro-translocation of cholera toxin and escape of cytosolic degradation.

Authors:  Chiara Rodighiero; Billy Tsai; Tom A Rapoport; Wayne I Lencer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Cholera holotoxin assembly requires a hydrophobic domain at the A-B5 interface: mutational analysis and development of an in vitro assembly system.

Authors:  Juliette K Tinker; Jarrod L Erbe; Wim G J Hol; Randall K Holmes
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Purification and characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pestis LcrV-cholera toxin A(2)/B chimeras.

Authors:  Juliette K Tinker; Chadwick T Davis; Britni M Arlian
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  Intoxication of zebrafish and mammalian cells by cholera toxin depends on the flotillin/reggie proteins but not Derlin-1 or -2.

Authors:  David E Saslowsky; Jin Ah Cho; Himani Chinnapen; Ramiro H Massol; Daniel J-F Chinnapen; Jessica S Wagner; Heidi E De Luca; Wendy Kam; Barry H Paw; Wayne I Lencer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  A mutant cholera toxin B subunit that binds GM1- ganglioside but lacks immunomodulatory or toxic activity.

Authors:  A T Aman; S Fraser; E A Merritt; C Rodigherio; M Kenny; M Ahn; W G Hol; N A Williams; W I Lencer; T R Hirst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structural basis of subtilase cytotoxin SubAB assembly.

Authors:  Jérôme Le Nours; Adrienne W Paton; Emma Byres; Sally Troy; Brock P Herdman; Matthew D Johnson; James C Paton; Jamie Rossjohn; Travis Beddoe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Multiscale Simulations of Biological Membranes: The Challenge To Understand Biological Phenomena in a Living Substance.

Authors:  Giray Enkavi; Matti Javanainen; Waldemar Kulig; Tomasz Róg; Ilpo Vattulainen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 9.  Animal Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Daniel Dubreuil; Richard E Isaacson; Dieter M Schifferli
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2016-10

Review 10.  Toxins and the gut: role in human disease.

Authors:  A Fasano
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.