Literature DB >> 9933530

Observation learning in day-old chicks using a one-trial passive avoidance learning paradigm.

.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that day-old chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, can learn to avoid an aversive stimulus if they observe the responses of another chick. In experiment 1, one of a pair of chicks (the actor) was allowed to peck at a bead coated in the bitter-tasting substance methylanthranilate (MeA), while we prevented the other chick (the observer) from pecking the bitter-tasting bead by separating the chicks with a piece of wire mesh. Both chicks avoided pecking at a similar but dry bead 0.5, 3 and 24 h after the observer chick saw the actor chick peck at an MeA-coated bead. By contrast, when the actor chick had pecked at a water-coated bead, both chicks continued to peck at a dry bead at 0.5, 3 and 24 h after training. Experiment 2 investigated whether observer chicks showed avoidance if they were prevented (by the insertion of an opaque barrier) from observing their companion pecking at the MeA-coated bead during either training or testing. Observer chicks that could not see their companion during training but could observe the actor chicks at test showed no subsequent avoidance whereas chicks that observed the actor chick at training, but not during testing, showed high levels of avoidance. Although the sensory cues (visual, auditory or olfactory) or types of behaviour (i.e. levels of pecking or head shaking) that the observer chick used to maintain avoidance remain unclear, the results show that chicks can learn about an aversive object by observing the responses of a conspecific. (c) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9933530     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  12 in total

1.  Development, direction, and damage limitation: social learning in domestic fowl.

Authors:  Christine J Nicol
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience.

Authors:  Liisa Hämäläinen; Rose Thorogood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Explaining social learning of food preferences without aversions: an evolutionary simulation model of Norway rats.

Authors:  J Noble; P M Todd; E Tuci
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Massed training-induced intermediate-term operant memory in aplysia requires protein synthesis and multiple persistent kinase cascades.

Authors:  Maximilian Michel; Charity L Green; Jacob S Gardner; Chelsea L Organ; Lisa C Lyons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Alarm cues and alarmed conspecifics: neural activity during social learning from different cues in Trinidadian guppies.

Authors:  Raina Fan; Simon M Reader; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Lateralization of social cognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Jonathan Niall Daisley; Elena Mascalzoni; Orsola Rosa-Salva; Rosa Rugani; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  What can fish brains tell us about visual perception?

Authors:  Orsola Rosa Salva; Valeria Anna Sovrano; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Can video playback provide social information for foraging blue tits?

Authors:  Liisa Hämäläinen; Hannah M Rowland; Johanna Mappes; Rose Thorogood
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Social transmission in the wild can reduce predation pressure on novel prey signals.

Authors:  Liisa Hämäläinen; William Hoppitt; Hannah M Rowland; Johanna Mappes; Anthony J Fulford; Sebastian Sosa; Rose Thorogood
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Peer attachment formation by systemic redox regulation with social training after a sensitive period.

Authors:  Mamiko Koshiba; Genta Karino; Aya Senoo; Koki Mimura; Yuka Shirakawa; Yuta Fukushima; Saya Obara; Hitomi Sekihara; Shimpei Ozawa; Kentaro Ikegami; Toyotoshi Ueda; Hideo Yamanouchi; Shun Nakamura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.