Literature DB >> 993229

Subcutaneous implants of polypropylene filaments.

T C Liebert, R P Chartoff, S L Cosgrove, R S McCuskey.   

Abstract

Extruded filaments of unmodified polypropylene (PP) with and without antioxidant were implanted subcutaneously in hamsters in order to determine their rate of degradation. Specimens were removed periodically during a 5 month test period and analyzed by infrared spectroscopy and dynamic mechanical testing. The analyses show that degradation beigns to occur after only a few days. Although the reaction sequence is not known, several factors suggest that the in vivo degradation process is similar to autoxidation which occurs in air or oxygen. The infrared data indicate that the hydroxyl content of the implants increases at a rate of 0.061 mg/g polypropylene per day during the initiation phase of the reaction. An induction time of 108 days was extablished. Carbonyl bonds appear after an implantation time of 50--90 days and increase therafter. Mechanical tests indicate a decrease in the dynamic loss tangent, tan delta, during the first month of implantation for unmodified polypropylene. No change in the infrared spectra or tan delta was observed, however, for implants containing an antioxidant. Thus, it is apparent that polypropylene filaments implanted subcutaneously in hamsters degrade by an oxidation process which is retarded effectively by using an antioxidant. While the findings reported are specific to subcutaneous polypropylene implants, they suggest that degradation of other systems may involve similar processes. This notion suggests directions for further research on increasing the in vivo stability of synthetic polymers. Long-term effects of polymer implantation upon tissue were not studied in this work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 993229     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820100611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  8 in total

1.  Five year study of tissue reaction to synthetic sutures.

Authors:  R W Postlethwait
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Raphael Rosch; Uwe Klinge; Ulf P Neumann; Petra Lynen Jansen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Petra Lynen Jansen; Joachim Conze; Ulf P Neumann; Karsten Junge
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.623

4.  In vivo polypropylene mesh degradation is hardly a myth.

Authors:  Margaret Thompson; Scott Guelcher; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev; Donald R Ostergard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  The myth: in vivo degradation of polypropylene-based meshes.

Authors:  Shelby F Thames; Joshua B White; Kevin L Ong
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Polypropylene mesh and systemic side effects in inguinal hernia repair: current evidence.

Authors:  Cillian Clancy; Patrick Jordan; Paul F Ridgway
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Analyzing material changes consistent with degradation of explanted polymeric hernia mesh related to clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Xinyue Lu; Melinda Harman; B Todd Heniford; Vedra Augenstein; Brittney McIver; William Bridges
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 8.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.