Literature DB >> 9931393

Results of surgical treatments and prognostic factors for hepatic hilar bile duct cancer.

S Ishiyama1, A Fuse, H Kuzu, Y Igarashi, M Urayama, K Suto, M Tsukamoto.   

Abstract

Results of surgical treatments for 57 patients who underwent resection for hepatic hilar bile duct cancer between 1984 and 1997 were studied. Bile duct resection was performed in eight patients, and combined resection of bile duct and liver was performed in 49 patients, of whom vascular reconstruction was added in 15 patients and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in six patients. All the operations of bile duct resection that were not combined with hepatectomy were non-curative. In the patients who underwent combined resection of the bile duct with liver, outcomes of the patients with well-differentiated adenocarcinoma were better than those with other lower-grade tumors. The factors related to the degree of tumor extension, such as serosal invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic vessel invasion, perineural invasion, venous vessel invasion, and vascular involvement, were other factors which significantly influenced the survival. Curative resection yielded significantly better results than non-curative resection. Of all these variables, good tumor differentiation and vascular involvement were recognized as important prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. Most of the postoperative deaths were encountered in patients who underwent additional operations to hepatectomy, such as vascular reconstruction or PD. Improvement of surgical techniques and perioperative care has yielded better outcomes of vascular reconstruction. However, the application of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy should be limited due to poor outcomes of widespread bile duct cancer of which the histological grade is usually low. Whereas prognosis of bile duct cancer involving the hepatic hilus is mainly determined by the biologic characteristics of the tumor, surgeons should consider the fact that most patients die of local recurrence regardless of the biologic character of the tumor when curative resection is not performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9931393     DOI: 10.1007/s005340050068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  5 in total

1.  Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection.

Authors:  Y Kitagawa; M Nagino; J Kamiya; K Uesaka; T Sano; H Yamamoto; N Hayakawa; Y Nimura
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Initial presentation and management of hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: is a node-positive status or potential margin-positive result a contraindication to resection?

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; Jennifer Steel; Tsafrir Vanounou; Allan Tsung; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Retroportal hepaticojejunostomy for extended resection of hilar bile ducts.

Authors:  Itaru Endo; Mitsutaka Sugita; Hideki Masunari; Kenichi Yoshida; Kazuhisa Takeda; Hitoshi Sekido; Shinji Togo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Immunohistochemically demonstrated lymph node micrometastasis and prognosis in patients with otherwise node-negative hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yuichiro Tojima; Masato Nagino; Tomoki Ebata; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Junichi Kamiya; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The value of bile replacement during external biliary drainage: an analysis of intestinal permeability, integrity, and microflora.

Authors:  Satoshi Kamiya; Masato Nagino; Hidetoshi Kanazawa; Shunichiro Komatsu; Toshihiko Mayumi; Kenji Takagi; Takashi Asahara; Koji Nomoto; Ryuichiro Tanaka; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.