Literature DB >> 9931347

H4 acetylation, XIST RNA and replication timing are coincident and define x;autosome boundaries in two abnormal X chromosomes.

A M Keohane1, A L Barlow, J Waters, D Bourn, B M Turner.   

Abstract

The inactive X (Xi) differs from its active homologue (Xa) in a number of ways, including increased methylation of CpG islands, replication late in S phase, underacetylation of histone H4 and association with XIST RNA. Global changes in DNA methylation occur relatively late in development, but the other properties all change during or shortly after the establishment of Xi and may play a role in the mechanism by which an inactive chromatin conformation spreads across most of the chromosome. In the present report, we use two human X;autosome translocation chromosomes to study the spreading of inactive X chromatin across X;autosome boundaries. In one of these chromosomes, t(X;6), Xp distal to p11.2 is replaced by 6p21.1-6pter and, in the other, ins(X;16), a small fragment derived from 16p13 is inserted into the distal third of Xq. In lymphoid cells from patients carrying these translocations in an unbalanced form, Xi was shown by HUMARA assay to be derived exclusively [t(X:6)] or predominantly [ins (X;16)] from the derived X chromosome. We used a combination of immunolabelling and RNA/DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization to define the distribution of XIST RNA, deacetylated H4 and late-replicating DNA across the two derived X chromosomes in inactive form. Within the limits of the cytogenetic techniques employed, the results show complete coincidence of these three parameters, with all three being excluded from the autosomal component of the derived X chromosome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9931347     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/8.2.377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  12 in total

Review 1.  Does (CUG)n repeat in DMPK mRNA 'paint' chromosome 19 to suppress distant genes to create the diverse phenotype of myotonic dystrophy?: A new hypothesis of long-range cis autosomal inactivation.

Authors:  R P Junghans; A Ebralidze; B Tiwari
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.660

2.  A unique late-replicating XY to autosome translocation in Peromyscus melanophrys.

Authors:  Elisabeth E Mlynarski; Craig Obergfell; Michael J Dewey; Rachel J O'Neill
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Xist RNA is confined to the nuclear territory of the silenced X chromosome throughout the cell cycle.

Authors:  Iris Jonkers; Kim Monkhorst; Eveline Rentmeester; J Anton Grootegoed; Frank Grosveld; Joost Gribnau
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  DNA methylation profiling in X;autosome translocations supports a role for L1 repeats in the spread of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Neeta Bala Tannan; Manisha Brahmachary; Paras Garg; Christelle Borel; Randah Alnefaie; Corey T Watson; N Simon Thomas; Andrew J Sharp
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Interference of the simian virus 40 origin of replication by the cytomegalovirus immediate early gene enhancer: evidence for competition of active regulatory chromatin conformation in a single domain.

Authors:  P H Chen; W B Tseng; Y Chu; M T Hsu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  X-chromosome inactivation: molecular mechanisms from the human perspective.

Authors:  Christine Yang; Andrew G Chapman; Angela D Kelsey; Jakub Minks; Allison M Cotton; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Attenuated spread of X-inactivation in an X;autosome translocation.

Authors:  Bilyana C Popova; Takashi Tada; Nobuo Takagi; Neil Brockdorff; Tatyana B Nesterova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Efficiency of Xist-mediated silencing on autosomes is linked to chromosomal domain organisation.

Authors:  Y Amy Tang; Derek Huntley; Giovanni Montana; Andrea Cerase; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.954

9.  Do LINEs have a role in X-chromosome inactivation?

Authors:  Mary F Lyon
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2006

10.  X chromosome inactivation and Xist evolution in a rodent lacking LINE-1 activity.

Authors:  Michael A Cantrell; Bryan C Carstens; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.