Literature DB >> 9931077

Safety of nifedipine in angina pectoris: a meta-analysis.

W B Stason1, C H Schmid, D Niedzwiecki, G W Whiting, J F Caubet, D Cory, D Luo, S D Ross, T C Chalmers.   

Abstract

-Our objective was to compare cardiovascular event rates in patients with stable angina receiving nifedipine as monotherapy or combination therapy and in active drug controls. A MEDLARS search of published articles from 1966 to 1995 in English, French, German, Italian, or Spanish, supplemented by a manual search of bibliographies, identified 60 randomized controlled trials that met protocol criteria. Blinded articles were extracted by 2 physicians. The pooled risks of death, withdrawal, and cardiovascular event were computed and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) for all nifedipine formulations and relative to same study control drug regimens. Thirty cardiovascular events were reported in 2635 nifedipine exposures (1.14%) and 19 events in 2655 other active drug exposures (0.72%). Unadjusted ORs for nifedipine versus controls were 1.40 (95% CI, 0.56 to 3.49) for major events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization procedure), 1.75 (95% CI, 0.83 to 3.67) for increased angina, and 1.61 (95% CI, 0.91 to 2.87) for all events (major events plus increased angina). Episodes of increased angina were more frequent on immediate-release nifedipine (OR, 4.19 [95% CI, 1.41 to 12.49]) and on nifedipine monotherapy (OR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.30 to 5.26]). The OR for immediate-release nifedipine was significantly higher than that for sustained-release/extended-release nifedipine (P=0.001), and the OR for nifedipine monotherapy was higher than that for nifedipine combination therapy (P=0.03). Increased risks of cardiovascular events in patients with stable angina on nifedipine were due primarily to more episodes of increased angina, confined to the immediate-release formulation and to nifedipine monotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9931077     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.33.1.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  4 in total

Review 1.  Improving safety reporting from randomised trials.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Joseph Lau
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Cilnidipine, a slow-acting Ca2+ channel blocker, induces relaxation in porcine coronary artery: role of endothelial nitric oxide and [Ca2+]i.

Authors:  Hok Sum Leung; Xiaoqiang Yao; Fung Ping Leung; Wing Hung Ko; Zhen-Yu Chen; Maik Gollasch; Yu Huang
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Calcium Channel Blockers in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention and Risk of Acute Events: Real-World Evidence from Nested Case-Control Studies on Italian Hypertensive Elderly.

Authors:  Alessandra Bettiol; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Alfredo Vannacci; Niccolò Lombardi; Graziano Onder; Nera Agabiti; Cristiana Vitale; Gianluca Trifirò; Giovanni Corrao; Giuseppe Roberto; Alessandro Mugelli; Alessandro Chinellato
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event.

Authors:  Fiona C Warren; Keith R Abrams; Su Golder; Alex J Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.