Literature DB >> 9930441

Treated bovine and autologous pericardium for aortic valve reconstruction.

C M Duran1, B Gometza, M Shahid, Z Al-Halees.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the differences in clinical behavior of bovine versus autologous pericardium, all consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve reconstruction were reviewed.
METHODS: Between October 1988 and December 1995, 91 patients (mean age 30 years) underwent reconstruction with bovine (n = 27) or autologous (n = 64) pericardium.
RESULTS: There were 2 hospital deaths, 5 late deaths, and no embolic events. Dysfunction of the aortic reconstruction required reoperation in 6 bovine (infection 1, fibrocalcific 5) and in 5 autologous (infection 3, annulus dilatation 1, commissural tear 1). Actuarial survival and freedom from structural deterioration at 8 years were 82.2%+/-9.6% and 76.2%+/-10.7% for bovine and 91.05%+/-3.96% and 96.8%+/-2.25% for autologous pericardium, respectively. The last Doppler echocardiographic study showed a mean regurgitation (1 to 4+) and gradient in the bovine pericardium of 1.25+/-and 20.7 mm Hg and in the autologous pericardium of 1+ and 7.7 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve reconstruction with pericardium can be safely performed with low thromboembolic rate. At 8 years follow up, there is a difference in favor of the autologous pericardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9930441     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01030-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

1.  Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for valvular disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Richard P Whitlock; Jack C Sun; Stephen E Fremes; Fraser D Rubens; Kevin H Teoh
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Complications after aortic valve repair and valve-sparing procedures.

Authors:  Michel Van Dyck; David Glineur; Laurent de Kerchove; Gébrine El Khoury
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

Review 3.  Aortic valve repair update.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Komiya
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-05

Review 4.  Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function.

Authors:  Shunsuke Matsushima; Irem Karliova; Simon Gauer; Shunsuke Miyahara; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-06

5.  Aortic valve replacement with autologous pericardium: long-term follow-up of 15 patients and in vivo histopathological changes of autologous pericardium.

Authors:  Xiaohong Liu; Lin Han; Zhigang Song; Mengwei Tan; Dejun Gong; Zhiyun Xu
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-11-08

6.  Is posterior leaflet extension and associated commissurotomy effective in rheumatic mitral valve disease? Long-term outcome.

Authors:  Suat Nail Omeroglu; Kaan Kirali; Denyan Mansuroglu; Deniz Goksedef; Mehmet Balkanay; Gokhan Ipek; Omer Isik; Cevat Yakut
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2004

7.  A simple method of aortic valve reconstruction with fixed pericardium in children.

Authors:  Amir-Reza Hosseinpour; Antonio González-Calle; Alejandro Adsuar-Gómez; José Santos-deSoto
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-23

8.  Neo-Leaflet Failure after Comprehensive Aortic Root and Valve Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sung Jun Park; Jeong Woo Lee; Cheol Hyun Chung
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-05

9.  Long-Term Results of the Leaflet Extension Technique for Rheumatic Aortic Regurgitation: A 20-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Kwak; Hyuk Ahn; Jae Woong Choi; Kyung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-02-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.