Literature DB >> 9930422

Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: bioprosthesis or mechanical valve?

Y Logeais1, T Langanay, H Corbineau, R Roussin, C Rioux, A Leguerrier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With increased life expectancy, valve operations are more and more common in elderly patients. The choice of valve substitute-mechanical valve or bioprosthesis-remains debated.
METHODS: Two groups of patients of the same age (69, 70, and 71 years) with isolated aortic valve replacement (mechanical 240, bioprostheses 289) were compared for mortality, morbidity, and valve-related complications.
RESULTS: No significant difference was found in survival, valve-related mortality, valve endocarditis, and thromboembolism. Mechanical valve had more bleeding events; bioprostheses had more structural deterioration, reoperation, and valve-related morbidity and mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: To avoid reoperations in octogenarians, the 10-year durability of current bioprostheses should be matched with the life expectancy of the particular patient. Bioprostheses should be used after 74 years in men and 78 years in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9930422     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01112-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  2 in total

1.  Aortic-left ventricular discontinuity of noninfectious origin.

Authors:  L Penninga; J Partridge; M Amrani
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  External validation of an index to predict up to 9-year mortality of community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Roger B Davis; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.