Literature DB >> 9930266

Difficulty in performing everyday activities in patients with juvenile macular dystrophies: comparison with patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

J P Szlyk1, G A Fishman, S Grover, B I Revelins, D J Derlacki.   

Abstract

AIMS: To ascertain the level of perceived difficulty experienced by patients with central vision loss due to juvenile macular dystrophies in the performance of everyday activities. A second objective was to compare their perceived difficulty with that of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) with primarily peripheral vision loss.
METHODS: 72 patients with Stargardt disease, cone dystrophy, or cone-rod dystrophy who had visual acuities worse than 20/40 and normal peripheral visual fields rated themselves on their difficulty in the performance of 33 activities encompassing a wide variety of everyday tasks. These findings were compared with the responses of 120 patients with typical RP or Usher syndrome type 2 who had visual acuities of 20/40 or better and peripheral visual field loss.
RESULTS: The juvenile macular dystrophy group reported the greatest level of overall self perceived difficulty with activities involving central vision, and lesser and variable degrees of difficulty with items within the mobility, negotiating steps, driving, and miscellaneous categories. Consistent with these findings, there were highly significant correlations between subjects' rated performances of activities involving central vision and the clinical measures of vision, including visual acuity and size of central scotoma. There were fewer significant correlations between perceived performance of activities in the other categories and the clinical measures. In general, those activities that showed significant correlations with the clinical measures of vision for the patients with juvenile macular dystrophies also showed significant differences in the patterns of responses between the juvenile macular dystrophy group and the RP group. Those items which were not correlated with the clinical measures in the juvenile macular dystrophy group tended not to show significant differences in the response patterns between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: These results provide insight into the types of perceived difficulties in performing tasks of everyday life in patients with these disorders which affect counselling of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9930266      PMCID: PMC1722454          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.12.1372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of driving performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  J P Szlyk; K R Alexander; K Severing; G A Fishman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-12

2.  Relationship between difficulty in performing daily activities and clinical measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  J P Szlyk; G A Fishman; K R Alexander; B I Revelins; D J Derlacki; R J Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-01

3.  Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  S K West; B Munoz; G S Rubin; O D Schein; K Bandeen-Roche; S Zeger; S German; L P Fried
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Retinitis pigmentosa. Genetic percentages.

Authors:  G A Fishman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-05

5.  Visual impairment and disability in older adults.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K B Roche; P Prasada-Rao; L P Fried
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 6.  Electroretinography and inherited macular dystrophies.

Authors:  G A Fishman
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1985 Summer-Fall       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Fundus flavimaculatus. A clinical classification.

Authors:  G A Fishman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-12

8.  Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status.

Authors:  C M Mangione; R S Phillips; J M Seddon; M G Lawrence; E F Cook; R Dailey; L Goldman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.983

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Seeing through their eyes: lived experiences of people with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  M Prem Senthil; J Khadka; K Pesudovs
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Vision-related quality of life in first stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Gabriele H Franke; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Educational levels in patients with stargardt disease.

Authors:  Anastasios Anastasakis; Azzrah Thobani; Gerald A Fishman; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Reproducibility of activation maps for longitudinal studies of visual function by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jing Ming; Keith R Thulborn; Janet P Szlyk
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Critical orientation for face identification in central vision loss.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Visual Acuity Change Over 24 Months and Its Association With Foveal Phenotype and Genotype in Individuals With Stargardt Disease: ProgStar Study Report No. 10.

Authors:  Xiangrong Kong; Kaoru Fujinami; Rupert W Strauss; Beatriz Munoz; Sheila K West; Artur V Cideciyan; Michel Michaelides; Mohamed Ahmed; Ann-Margret Ervin; Etienne Schönbach; Janet K Cheetham; Hendrik P N Scholl
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Self-reported quality of life in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and maculopathy of Bothnia type.

Authors:  Marie S I Burstedt; Eva Mönestam
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24

8.  Assessment of vision-related quality of life in patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Eleni Papageorgiou; Gregor Hardiess; Frank Schaeffel; Horst Wiethoelter; Hans-Otto Karnath; Hanspeter Mallot; Birgitt Schoenfisch; Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Functional visual fields: a cross-sectional UK study to determine which visual field paradigms best reflect difficulty with mobility function.

Authors:  Hikmat Subhi; Keziah Latham; Joy Myint; Michael Crossland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Behavioural Adaptation to Hereditary Macular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review on the Effect of Early Onset Central Field Loss on Peripheral Visual Abilities.

Authors:  Aishah Baig; David Buckley; Charlotte Codina
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.