Literature DB >> 9930144

Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy specimens. Correlation with extraprostatic extension at resection.

S O Vargas1, M Jiroutek, W R Welch, M R Nucci, A V D'Amico, A A Renshaw.   

Abstract

The significance of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy specimens for predicting extraprostatic extension is controversial. We correlated the presence of perineural invasion in needle biopsy specimens from 340 men with the presence of extraprostatic extension in corresponding radical prostatectomy specimens. Perineural invasion was present in 57 biopsy specimens. The sensitivity of perineural invasion for predicting extraprostatic extension was 32%, the specificity 88%, and the positive predictive value 42%. Biopsy specimens with perineural invasion had significantly more core specimens involved with tumor and higher biopsy-determined Gleason scores than those without invasion. Biopsy specimens with perineural invasion were significantly more likely to show extraprostatic extension and Gleason scores were higher in the resection specimens than those without perineural invasion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that perineural invasion remained an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension. However, in multivariate analysis, including preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for 173 of the patients, the only independent predictor of extraprostatic extension was PSA. While perineural invasion in biopsy specimens is a predictor of extraprostatic extension at resection that is independent of other histologic features, the positive predictive value is low and it is not an independent predictor when serum PSA is included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9930144     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/111.2.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  7 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Yi-Fan Chen; Marnie Bertolet; Elen Woldemichael; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Histopathology reporting of prostate needle biopsies. 2005 update.

Authors:  Rodolfo Montironi; Remigio Vela Navarrete; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Gregor Mikuz; Aldo V Bono
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  The significance of perineural invasion found on needle biopsy of the prostate: implications for definitive therapy.

Authors:  S R Potter; A W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

Review 4.  The laminin binding integrin alpha6beta1 in prostate cancer perineural invasion.

Authors:  Isis C Sroka; Todd A Anderson; Kathy M McDaniel; Raymond B Nagle; Matthew B Gretzer; Anne E Cress
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Synoptic Versus Narrative Reporting of Prostate Biopsies at a Tertiary Healthcare Institution: Challenges, successes and expectations.

Authors:  Nnamdi O Orah; Charles C Anunobi; Rufus W Ojewola
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-10-10

Review 6.  The role of endorectal coil MRI in preoperative staging and decision-making for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Karim Touijer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Relationship Between Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy Specimens and Pathologic Staging After Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hassan Niroomand; Mohammadreza Nowroozi; Mohsen Ayati; Hassan Jamshidian; Amir Arbab; Seyed Ali Momeni; Alireza Ghadian; Hamidreza Ghorbani
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2016-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.