Literature DB >> 9929259

Improving patient outcomes by including patient preferences in nursing care.

C M Ruland1.   

Abstract

While preference elicitation techniques have been effective in supporting patients in their abilities to make decisions consistent with their preferences, little is known about whether information about patient preferences affects clinicians in clinical decision making and improves patient outcomes. This paper presents a study that tested the effect of eliciting elderly patients' preferences for self-care capability and providing this information to nurses in clinical practice on nurses' care priorities and patient outcomes. The study showed that information about patient preferences changed nurses' care priorities to be more consistent with patient preferences and improved patient outcomes of preference achievement and physical functioning. These results emphasize the importance of continuing to refine strategies for eliciting and integrating patient preferences into patient care as a means to improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9929259      PMCID: PMC2232124     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  10 in total

1.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

2.  Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; H J Sutherland; E C Thiel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; W B Carter; B S Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Automated computer interviews to elicit utilities: potential applications in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  L A Lenert; R M Soetikno
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Whose utilities for decision analysis?

Authors:  N F Boyd; H J Sutherland; K Z Heasman; D L Tritchler; B J Cummings
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1990 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  A decision analysis of streptokinase plus heparin as compared with heparin alone for deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  J J O'Meara; R A McNutt; A T Evans; S W Moore; S M Downs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Benign and malignant breast disease: the relationship between women's health status and health values.

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; H J Sutherland; D L Tritchler; G A Lockwood; J E Till; A Ciampi; J F Scott; L A Lickley; E B Fish
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care.

Authors:  J F Kasper; A G Mulley; J E Wennberg
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-06

10.  Methodological issues in measuring patient-reported outcomes: the agenda of the Work Group on Outcomes Assessment.

Authors:  F J Fowler; P D Cleary; J Magaziner; D L Patrick; K L Benjamin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Data quality and the electronic medical record: a role for direct parental data entry.

Authors:  S C Porter; K D Mandl
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction - an essay.

Authors:  K Klose; S Kreimeier; U Tangermann; I Aumann; K Damm
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-05-21

Review 3.  Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity.

Authors:  Dee Mangin; Gaibrie Stephen; Verdah Bismah; Cathy Risdon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.