Literature DB >> 9929222

Physician use of an ambulatory medical record system: matching form and function.

N Folz-Murphy1, M Partin, L Williams, C M Harris, M S Lauer.   

Abstract

An ambulatory medical record system was implemented as a pilot project to determine the clinical and operational impacts of using interactive, computer-based systems in the outpatient setting. Of the 58 physicians who attempted to use the AMR system, 28 continue as active users. Physicians who discontinued use of the system reported a variety of reasons for their dissatisfaction. As a result of the pilot, the AMR implementation team and physicians understand better how to fit the AMR system to a physician's specific requirements, as well as enhance the operation of the physician's practice. Armed with the experience gained during the early phases of the implementation, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation now intends a cautious expansion and continued evaluation of the AMR system, with the objective of meeting organizational needs with appropriate technical functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9929222      PMCID: PMC2232387     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  5 in total

Review 1.  The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Longitudinal electronic patient records. A challenge of our time.

Authors:  E R Gabrieli
Journal:  Comput Nurs       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  Computer-stored medical records. Their future role in medical practice.

Authors:  C J McDonald; W M Tierney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art.

Authors:  D F Sittig; W W Stead
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  An informatics-based chronic disease practice: case study of a 35-year computer-based longitudinal record system.

Authors:  R A Nordyke; C A Kulikowski
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Computer needs assessment based on nursing tasks.

Authors:  S Gohlinghorst; C Weir; T Nutt; C McCarthy
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof.

Authors:  Ryan T O'Connell; Christine Cho; Nidhi Shah; Karen Brown; Richard N Shiffman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  [Do we gain or lose information with computerisation?].

Authors:  M Quesada Sabaté; N Prat Gil; E Cardús Gómez; J Caula Ros; G Masllorens Vilà
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters.

Authors:  C S Gadd; L E Penrod
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

5.  IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Carola Iller; Cornelia Mahler
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.