Literature DB >> 9929101

Circulating cytokines response and the level of erythropoiesis in sickle cell anemia.

H Croizat1, R L Nagel.   

Abstract

A hemoglobin F (HbF) level between eight and nine percent divides sickle cell anemia (SS) patients into two populations, according to the kinetics of circulating burst forming units-erythroid (BFU-E), long term culture-initialing cells (LTC-IC), and cytokine plasma concentrations. The SS patients with HbF levels lower than 8-9% are more anemic (LFSS patients) than those with HbF levels higher than 8-9% who have less severe anemia (HFSS patients). We report here that the level of erythropoiesis [evaluated by the levels of soluble transferin receptors (sTfR)] is not identical in these two patient populations, supporting the idea that a different set of regulatory mechanisms might be required to maintain the two levels of increased hematopoiesis. The plasma sTfR concentration was increased in all SS samples compared with controls (P < 0.002) and sTfR levels were negatively correlated with peripheral HbF%. (r = -0.574, P < 0.002). Furthermore, sTfR levels were higher in LFSS than in HFSS patients. Erythropoietin (Epo) levels were increased in the plasma of LFSS individuals (range = 34-215 ml U/ml), while the values in HFSS patients were in the normal range (3-20 ml U/ml). Furthermore, we identify here stem cell factor (SCF) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) as regulatory factors specifically affected by the presence of SS genotype and its level of severity. The plasma concentrations of SCF and TGF-beta were increased compared with normal controls and high levels of SCF (up to 7,000 pg/ml) were detected in LFSS patients. The latter also showed increased proportion of SCF+ CD34 enriched circulating cells (49%). Low SCF in HFSS patients is associated with elevated TGF-beta, suggesting a regulatory role of the latter on either SCF release or c-kit expression in progenitor cells. Occasional elevation of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interleukin (IL)-7, and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha in plasma of SS patients is not specific because no relation to HbF could be demonstrated. All plasma tested for leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) were negative. Data presented here, complementing previously published information, supports a model in which HFSS patients achieve a balance between inhibitory (TGF-beta) and stimulatory (SCF, IL-3) factors, resulting in moderate erythropoietic response. In contrast, in LFSS patients, low levels of TGF-beta and the increased release of GM-CSF and SCF maintain the intense erythropoiesis in response to higher erythropoietic stress, in these more severe patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9929101     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8652(199902)60:2<105::aid-ajh4>3.0.co;2-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  13 in total

1.  The proinflammatory cytokine GM-CSF downregulates fetal hemoglobin expression by attenuating the cAMP-dependent pathway in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Tohru Ikuta; Adekunle D Adekile; Diana R Gutsaeva; James B Parkerson; Shobha D Yerigenahally; Betsy Clair; Abdullah Kutlar; Nadine Odo; C Alvin Head
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Immune regulation in chronically transfused allo-antibody responder and nonresponder patients with sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia major.

Authors:  Weili Bao; Hui Zhong; Xiaojuan Li; Margaret T Lee; Joseph Schwartz; Sujit Sheth; Karina Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  High levels of neopterin and interleukin-3 in sickle cell disease patients.

Authors:  L Rodrigues; F F Costa; S T O Saad; H Z W Grotto
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Inhibition of erythroblast growth and fetal hemoglobin production by ribofuranose-substituted adenosine derivatives.

Authors:  Natarajan V Bhanu; Y Terry Lee; Patricia A Oneal; Nicole M Gantt; Wulin Aerbajinai; Pierre Noel; Craig J Thomas; Jeffery L Miller
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-06-30

5.  Oxidative stress and induction of heme oxygenase-1 in the kidney in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  K A Nath; J P Grande; J J Haggard; A J Croatt; Z S Katusic; A Solovey; R P Hebbel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Evidence for ineffective erythropoiesis in severe sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Catherine J Wu; Lakshamanan Krishnamurti; Jeffery L Kutok; Melinda Biernacki; Shelby Rogers; Wandi Zhang; Joseph H Antin; Jerome Ritz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Single-cell analysis of bone marrow-derived CD34+ cells from children with sickle cell disease and thalassemia.

Authors:  Peng Hua; Noemi Roy; Josu de la Fuente; Guanlin Wang; Supat Thongjuea; Kevin Clark; Anindita Roy; Bethan Psaila; Neil Ashley; Yvonne Harrington; Claus Nerlov; Suzanne M Watt; Irene Roberts; James O J Davies
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Erythrocyte NADPH oxidase activity modulated by Rac GTPases, PKC, and plasma cytokines contributes to oxidative stress in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Alex George; Suvarnamala Pushkaran; Diamantis G Konstantinidis; Sebastian Koochaki; Punam Malik; Narla Mohandas; Yi Zheng; Clinton H Joiner; Theodosia A Kalfa
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Placenta growth factor induces 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein to increase leukotriene formation in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Nitin Patel; Caryn S Gonsalves; Minyang Yang; Punam Malik; Vijay K Kalra
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Mathematical modeling of erythrocyte chimerism informs genetic intervention strategies for sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Philipp M Altrock; Christian Brendel; Raffaele Renella; Stuart H Orkin; David A Williams; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 10.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.