Literature DB >> 9928962

Decision-making preference and opportunity in VA ambulatory care patients: association with patient satisfaction.

R M Harvey1, L Kazis, A F Lee.   

Abstract

Using data from the Veterans Health Study, associations were examined for decision-making preference, decision-making opportunity, and satisfaction with medical care among a sample of 266 men who use Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) ambulatory health care services. Results indicated that veterans with a high preference for involvement in decision-making and low provider-offered decision-making opportunities had significantly lower satisfaction with medical care compared to veterans with either low preference for decision-making involvement with high or low opportunity, or those with a high decision-making preference and high decision-making opportunity. The findings suggest that health care providers may increase patient satisfaction with medical care by providing opportunities for decision-making to patients who prefer involvement in their health care decision-making. Provider strategies for increasing patient decision-making involvement are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9928962     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199902)22:1<39::aid-nur5>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  14 in total

Review 1.  Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?

Authors:  Rachel E Davis; Rosamond Jacklin; Nick Sevdalis; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; Charles B Bennett; Christopher J Trentacosta; Caitlin McLear
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-06-16

3.  Patient-Clinician Communication: The Roadmap for HCI.

Authors:  Lauren Wilcox; Rupa Patel; Anthony Back; Mary Czerwinski; Paul Gorman; Eric Horvitz; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  Ext Abstr Hum Factors Computing Syst       Date:  2013-04-27

4.  Policies for patient access to clinical data via PHRs: current state and recommendations.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; David K Vawdrey; Rita Kukafka; Gilad J Kuperman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Justice in health care decision-making: patients' appraisals of health care providers and health plan representatives.

Authors:  Mark Fondacaro; Bianca Frogner; Rudolf Moos
Journal:  Soc Justice Res       Date:  2005-03

Review 6.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

7.  Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of Health Care Empowerment: development and validation of the Health Care Empowerment inventory.

Authors:  Mallory O Johnson; Carol Dawson Rose; Samantha E Dilworth; Torsten B Neilands
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Are elderly people with co-morbidities involved adequately in medical decision making when hospitalised? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Anne W Ekdahl; Lars Andersson; Ann-Britt Wiréhn; Maria Friedrichsen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Is patients' preferred involvement in health decisions related to outcomes for patients with HIV?

Authors:  Mary Catherine Beach; Patrick S Duggan; Richard D Moore
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Does participatory decision making improve hypertension self-care behaviors and outcomes?

Authors:  Alex H Cho; Corrine I Voils; William S Yancy; Eugene Z Oddone; Hayden B Bosworth
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.