Literature DB >> 9928835

Lateral balance organisation in human stance in response to a random or predictable perturbation.

M Gilles1, A M Wing, S G Kirker.   

Abstract

The effect of the predictability of perturbation to standing balance was evaluated in terms of the muscle activity and response dynamics of five subjects exposed to horizontal forces at the pelvis producing sideways or forward sway. Rapid (EMG onset latencies of 70-80 ms recorded from the left gluteus medius and gastrocnemius) and qualitatively different patterns of response were produced by forward pushes and pushes to either side. However, the EMG response to left push was constant in pattern and timing, whether the push direction was constant and, therefore, predictable over a block of trials or whether the left push trials were interleaved randomly with right push or forward push trials. Moreover, there were no systematic effects of perturbation direction uncertainty on the latency and rate of increase of ground reaction forces. We conclude that prior information does not speed postural responses that differ quantitatively according to the direction of perturbation to balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9928835     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  14 in total

1.  Analysis of human postural responses to recoverable falls.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; P DiZio; E Rabin; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Deceleration affects anticipatory and reactive components of triggered postural responses.

Authors:  Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; Sylvia Quant; Brian E Maki; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Role of lateral muscles and body orientation in feedforward postural control.

Authors:  Marcio J Santos; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cognition and balance control: does processing of explicit contextual cues of impending perturbations modulate automatic postural responses?

Authors:  Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Linearity and repeatability of postural responses in relation to peak force and impulse of manually delivered perturbations: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zeevi Dvir; Maria Paterna; Martina Quargnenti; Carlo De Benedictis; Daniela Maffiodo; Walter Franco; Carlo Ferraresi; Andrea Manca; Franca Deriu; Silvestro Roatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Light touch for balance: influence of a time-varying external driving signal.

Authors:  Alan M Wing; Leif Johannsen; Satoshi Endo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Stability of vertical posture explored with unexpected mechanical perturbations: synergy indices and motor equivalence.

Authors:  Momoko Yamagata; Ali Falaki; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Hip proprioceptive feedback influences the control of mediolateral stability during human walking.

Authors:  Devin C Roden-Reynolds; Megan H Walker; Camille R Wasserman; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The influence of artificially increased hip and trunk stiffness on balance control in man.

Authors:  C Grüneberg; B R Bloem; F Honegger; J H J Allum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.