Literature DB >> 9928600

Recycled cafeteria food waste as a feed for swine: nutrient content digestibility, growth, and meat quality.

M L Westendorf1, Z C Dong, P A Schoknecht.   

Abstract

This project was undertaken to compare growth, meat quality, and diet digestibility when pigs were fed cafeteria food waste (FW) or a corn/soybean meal (CSM) diet. Cafeteria food waste (36 samples) fed in the growing and finishing experiment averaged 22.4% DM, 21.4% CP, 14.1% ADF, 27.2% ether extract, and 3.2% ash. The first experiment used 50 crossbred pigs randomly assigned to four diets. During the growing phase, pigs fed a CSM diet gained faster (P < .05) than pigs fed FW or FW plus energy supplements. However, the two groups fed FW plus energy supplements (at 25 or 50% of the intake of the CSM diet) gained faster (P < .05) than pigs fed FW alone (.61 and .65 kg/d, respectively, vs .46 kg/d). In the finishing phase, FW plus an energy supplement fed at 50% of the level of CSM intake resulted in gains that did not differ from those of pigs fed the CSM diet (.90 vs .99 kg/d; P > .05). A nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance trial using eight growing barrows compared FW with the same CSM growing diet fed earlier. Dry matter digestibility was similar for the two diets (P > .05). However, CP digestibility was higher (P < .05) in the FW diet than in the CSM diet (88.2 vs 84.3%). Although the percentage of nitrogen retained was not different between FW and CSM diets (56.0 vs 55.2%; P > .05), the amount of nitrogen retained was greater for pigs fed the CSM diet (29.3 vs. 24.5 g/d; P < .05) because DMI was greater (1.7 vs 1.4 kg/d) for pigs fed CSM compared with FW. At the completion of the finishing experiment, six pigs were selected from both the CSM and FW diets and fed to finishing weight. The pigs were slaughtered, and the pork loins were removed for flavor and texture analysis. A consumer panel rated the meat quality from FW pigs as acceptable and overall flavor comparable to CSM pigs (P > .05). These results indicate that food waste has nutritive value and may be useful in swine diets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9928600     DOI: 10.2527/1998.76122976x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Meat Quality Traits of Pigs Finished on Food Waste.

Authors:  Jihwan Choe; Knowledge M Moyo; Kibum Park; Jeongho Jeong; Haeun Kim; Yungsun Ryu; Jonggun Kim; Jun-Mo Kim; Sanghoon Lee; Gwang-Woong Go
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there's swill, there's a way.

Authors:  Erasmus K H J Zu Ermgassen; Ben Phalan; Rhys E Green; Andrew Balmford
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Solid Waste Management Solutions for a Rapidly Urbanizing Area in Thailand: Recommendations Based on Stakeholder Input.

Authors:  Nachalida Yukalang; Beverley Clarke; Kirstin Ross
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Bioactive Compounds in Food Waste: A Review on the Transformation of Food Waste to Animal Feed.

Authors:  Alexandros Georganas; Elisavet Giamouri; Athanasios C Pappas; George Papadomichelakis; Fenia Galliou; Thrassyvoulos Manios; Eleni Tsiplakou; Kostas Fegeros; George Zervas
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-03-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.