Literature DB >> 9928207

Endogenous retroviruses: a potential problem for xenotransplantation?

J P Stoye1, P Le Tissier, Y Takeuchi, C Patience, R A Weiss.   

Abstract

To overcome the shortage of suitable human donors for transplantation attention has recently turned to the possibility of using genetically modified pigs as a source of cells and organs. It has been suggested that such procedures might facilitate the introduction of novel retroviruses, normally resident in the pig germ line, into the human population (Stoye and Coffin, Nature Medicine 1: 1100, 1995). The consequences of such a transfer remain unclear; however, the demonstration that certain porcine cell lines express infectious retroviruses which can infect human cells (Patience et al., Nature Medicine 3: 282-286, 1997) emphasizes that there are grounds for practical concern. We have now cloned the envelope genes of the expressed viruses and are using these clones in studies of the interaction of the porcine viruses with their cellular receptors. We have also initiated studies of the inheritance and expression of human-tropic endogenous proviruses present in different pig populations. These studies reveal that at least two classes of human-tropic endogenous porcine retrovirus are widely distributed in pigs (Le Tissier et al., Nature 389: 681-681, 1997). The implications of our results for assessing the potential risk of retroviral transfer during xenotransplantation are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9928207     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09118.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  9 in total

1.  Xenotransplantation. This new form of treatment might benefit millions.

Authors:  D K Cooper; C G Groth; I F McKenzie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-25

2.  Molecular cloning and functional analysis of three type D endogenous retroviruses of sheep reveal a different cell tropism from that of the highly related exogenous jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus.

Authors:  M Palmarini; C Hallwirth; D York; C Murgia; T de Oliveira; T Spencer; H Fan
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  The case for xenotransplantation.

Authors:  David K C Cooper
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Identification of novel porcine endogenous betaretrovirus sequences in miniature swine.

Authors:  T Ericsson; B Oldmixon; J Blomberg; M Rosa; C Patience; G Andersson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Study of full-length porcine endogenous retrovirus genomes with envelope gene polymorphism in a specific-pathogen-free Large White swine herd.

Authors:  S Bösch; C Arnauld; A Jestin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Porcine endogenous retroviruses PERV A and A/C recombinant are insensitive to a range of divergent mammalian TRIM5alpha proteins including human TRIM5alpha.

Authors:  Andrew Wood; Benjamin L J Webb; Birke Bartosch; Torsten Schaller; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Greg J Towers
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 7.  Recent strategies to overcome the hyperacute rejection in pig to human xenotransplantation.

Authors:  P Igaz
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

8.  Host range and interference studies of three classes of pig endogenous retrovirus.

Authors:  Y Takeuchi; C Patience; S Magre; R A Weiss; P T Banerjee; P Le Tissier; J P Stoye
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  A paradigm for virus-host coevolution: sequential counter-adaptations between endogenous and exogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Frederick Arnaud; Marco Caporale; Mariana Varela; Roman Biek; Bernardo Chessa; Alberto Alberti; Matthew Golder; Manuela Mura; Ya-Ping Zhang; Li Yu; Filipe Pereira; James C Demartini; Kreg Leymaster; Thomas E Spencer; Massimo Palmarini
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.823

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.