Literature DB >> 9927915

Effect on caries experience of a long-term preventive program for mothers and children starting during pregnancy.

H Günay1, K Dmoch-Bockhorn, Y Günay, W Geurtsen.   

Abstract

The aim of this three-phase prospective study was to determine the effects of a primary-primary prevention program on the oral health of children. Eighty-six pregnant women from various social backgrounds participated in the first phase of this study. In the second phase (at 3 years of age) 54 of the mother-child couples and in the third phase (at 4 years of age) 47 of the mother-child couples remained. Participants were recalled every 6 months and received individual prophylactic care. The following clinical parameters were assessed at each examination period for mother and child: DMF-S or dmf-s, proximal plaque index, and the salivary level of Streptococcus mutans (Dentocult SM). The control group consisted of 65 (at 3 years of age) and 45 (at 4 years of age) children from various kindergartens. All children in the second phase of the study group revealed a naturally healthy dentition with an API of 0-25% and a salivary S. mutans score of 0 (0-10(3) cfu/ml). In the third phase, only four of the 47 children of the study group showed caries, with a mean dmf-s of 1.5. No S. mutans could be detected in 20 (42.6%) children. Ten (21.3%) children of the study group showed a S. mutans score of > or = 2 (> 10(5) cfu/ml). In contrast, only 53 of the 65 children of the control group (second phase) and 26 of the 45 control children (third phase) revealed a naturally healthy dentition. The remaining 19 children of the control group revealed a mean dmf-s of 7.0 at 4 years of age. In the control group, no S. mutans could be detected in 25 (38.5%) children at 3 years of age whereas 21 (32.3%) children showed a S. mutans score of > or = 2. In the third phase, a salivary S. mutans score of > or = 2 was found in 27 (60%) children of the control group. The statistical comparison between the study and the control groups revealed significant differences for all results determined (P < 0.001). Additionally, all mothers revealed a significant improvement in oral health and a reduction of salivary S. mutans colonization. From our data we conclude that a pre- and postnatal prevention program (primary-primary vs primary prevention) may significantly improve the oral health of mother and child.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9927915     DOI: 10.1007/s007840050059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  23 in total

1.  Dental care use and self-reported dental problems in relation to pregnancy.

Authors:  Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Paula Krakowiak; Philippe P Hujoel; Riley M Peters
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Disparities in unmet dental need and dental care received by pregnant women in Maryland.

Authors:  Astha Singhal; Amit Chattopadhyay; A Isabel Garcia; Amy B Adams; Diana Cheng
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-09

3.  An early oral health care program starting during pregnancy: results of a prospective clinical long-term study.

Authors:  Karen Meyer; Werner Geurtsen; Hüsamettin Günay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Prevention in kindergartens with 500 ppm fluoride toothpaste-a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Klaus Pieper; Julia Winter; Martina Krutisch; Petra Völkner-Stetefeld; Anahita Jablonski-Momeni
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  WITHDRAWN: Community-based population-level interventions for promoting child oral health.

Authors:  Andrea M de Silva; Shalika Hegde; Bridget Akudo Nwagbara; Hanny Calache; Mark G Gussy; Mona Nasser; Hannah R Morrice; Elisha Riggs; Pamela M Leong; Lisa K Meyenn; Reza Yousefi-Nooraie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-22

6.  Prenatal Oral Health Care and Early Childhood Caries Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Xiao; Naemah Alkhers; Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; Ronald J Billings; Tong Tong Wu; Daniel A Castillo; Linda Rasubala; Hans Malmstrom; Yanfang Ren; Eli Eliav
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Pregnant Women's Infant Oral Health Knowledge and Beliefs: Influence of Having Given Birth and of Having a Child in the Home.

Authors:  Suzanne D Baker; Rocio B Quiñonez; Kim Boggess; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-06

8.  Clinical efficacy of a two-year oral health programme for infants and toddlers in Singapore.

Authors:  Bien Lai; Wee Kiat Tan; Qing Shu Lu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 9.  Community-based population-level interventions for promoting child oral health.

Authors:  Andrea M de Silva; Shalika Hegde; Bridget Akudo Nwagbara; Hanny Calache; Mark G Gussy; Mona Nasser; Hannah R Morrice; Elisha Riggs; Pamela M Leong; Lisa K Meyenn; Reza Yousefi-Nooraie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-15

10.  An early oral health care program starting during pregnancy--a long-term study--phase V.

Authors:  Karen Meyer; Mansoureh Khorshidi-Böhm; Werner Geurtsen; Hüsamettin Günay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.