Literature DB >> 9927011

Exercise and cellular innate immune function.

J A Woods1, J M Davis, J A Smith, D C Nieman.   

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence suggests a link between the intensity of exercise and infectious and neoplastic disease. One likely way by which exercise exerts its effect on cancer and infection is by altering the function of the immune system. Cells of the innate immune system (i.e., macrophage [Mphi], natural killer [NK] cell, and polymorphonuclear neutrophils [PMN]) are first-line defenders against cancer and infectious disease by nature of their phagocytic, cytolytic, and antimicrobial properties. The purpose of this review is to define the role of cells of the innate immune system (i.e., Mphi, PMN, and NK cells) in infection and cancer, present current information regarding the effects of acute and chronic exercise on the quantification and functional activities of these cells, and briefly to discuss potential mechanisms as to how exercise affects these cells and describe how these changes may potentially affect susceptibility to infection and cancer. The effects of exercise on the number, functions, and characteristics of cells of the innate immune system are complex and are dependent several factors, including 1) the cell function or characteristic being analyzed; 2) the intensity, duration and chronicity of exercise; 3) the timing of measurement in relation to the exercise bout; 4) the dose and type of immunomodulator used to stimulate the cell in vitro or in vivo; and 5) the site of cellular origin. Further studies are needed to determine whether the exercise-induced changes in immune function alter incidence or progression of disease. Likewise, the mechanisms as to how exercise alters innate immune function are as yet unresolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9927011     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199901000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  36 in total

Review 1.  Biobehavioral outcomes following psychological interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

Review 2.  Leisure-time physical activity and lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adonina Tardon; Won Jin Lee; Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez; Mustafa Dosemeci; Demetrius Albanes; Robert Hoover; Aaron Blair
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Nutritional and Physical Activity Interventions to Improve Immunity.

Authors:  Glen Davison; Corinna Kehaya; Arwel Wyn Jones
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2014-11-25

4.  The effect of physical training on the N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mammary carcinogenesis of Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Iwona Malicka; Katarzyna Siewierska; Bartosz Pula; Christopher Kobierzycki; Dominik Haus; Urszula Paslawska; Marek Cegielski; Piotr Dziegiel; Marzena Podhorska-Okolow; Marek Wozniewski
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2015-05-19

5.  Habitual physical activity levels and health outcomes of Ontario youth.

Authors:  Panagiota Klentrou; John Hay; Michael Plyley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Physical activity and survival after prostate cancer diagnosis in the health professionals follow-up study.

Authors:  Stacey A Kenfield; Meir J Stampfer; Edward Giovannucci; June M Chan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Does smoking influence the physical activity and lung cancer relation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniela Schmid; Cristian Ricci; Gundula Behrens; Michael F Leitzmann
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Does physical activity reduce the risk of developing peptic ulcers?

Authors:  Y Cheng; C A Macera; D R Davis; S N Blair
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Exercise enhances vaccine-induced antigen-specific T cell responses.

Authors:  Connie J Rogers; David A Zaharoff; Kenneth W Hance; Susan N Perkins; Stephen D Hursting; Jeffrey Schlom; John W Greiner
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Combination of physical activity, nutrition, or other metabolic factors and vaccine response.

Authors:  Kenneth W Hance; Connie J Rogers; Stephen D Hursting; John W Greiner
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2007-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.