BACKGROUND: The appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain. It is hypothesized that a waiting period allows the myocardium to recover prior to revascularization, thus decreasing morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to determine if a waiting strategy is justified following AMI in patients requiring elective CABG. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1996, 214 patients underwent isolated, nonrepeat, elective CABG. Three groups were evaluated: group I, control, 155 patients with no AMI; group 11, 39 patients with nontransmural AMI; and Group III, 20 patients with transmural AMI. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected and compared among all groups. RESULTS: Groups were well-matched demographically: group I, patients waited an average of 2.3 days in hospital prior to operation; group II, an average of 4.2 days; and group III, an average of 5.2 days. Except for the use of inotropes, group I 34%, group 11 39%, and group III 70% (P = 0.007), and the intra-aortic balloon pump, group I 0%, group 11 8%, and group III 25% (P = 0.001). There were no differences in complications. Importantly, there was no difference in mortality or postoperative length of stay. The mortality in group I was 2.6%, in group 11 2.6%, and in group III 0%. The length of stay in groups I and II was 8.5 days, and in group III, 8.1 days. CONCLUSION: A waiting period of 3 to 5 days after a nontransmural AMI and 5 to 7 days after a transmural AMI can produce similar postoperative results to non-AMI patients undergoing CABG. Thus, a waiting strategy to allow the myocardium to recover is justified.
BACKGROUND: The appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain. It is hypothesized that a waiting period allows the myocardium to recover prior to revascularization, thus decreasing morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to determine if a waiting strategy is justified following AMI in patients requiring elective CABG. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1996, 214 patients underwent isolated, nonrepeat, elective CABG. Three groups were evaluated: group I, control, 155 patients with no AMI; group 11, 39 patients with nontransmural AMI; and Group III, 20 patients with transmural AMI. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected and compared among all groups. RESULTS: Groups were well-matched demographically: group I, patients waited an average of 2.3 days in hospital prior to operation; group II, an average of 4.2 days; and group III, an average of 5.2 days. Except for the use of inotropes, group I 34%, group 11 39%, and group III 70% (P = 0.007), and the intra-aortic balloon pump, group I 0%, group 11 8%, and group III 25% (P = 0.001). There were no differences in complications. Importantly, there was no difference in mortality or postoperative length of stay. The mortality in group I was 2.6%, in group 11 2.6%, and in group III 0%. The length of stay in groups I and II was 8.5 days, and in group III, 8.1 days. CONCLUSION: A waiting period of 3 to 5 days after a nontransmural AMI and 5 to 7 days after a transmural AMI can produce similar postoperative results to non-AMI patients undergoing CABG. Thus, a waiting strategy to allow the myocardium to recover is justified.