Literature DB >> 9926779

Residual metastatic axillary lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

H M Kuerer1, L A Newman, A U Buzdar, K K Hunt, K Dhingra, T A Buchholz, S M Binkley, F C Ames, B W Feig, M I Ross, G N Hortobagyi, S E Singletary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to validate the prognostic significance of residual axillary lymph node metastases in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to analyze other clinicopathologic factors that might be independent predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in an attempt to identify patients in whom axillary dissection might be omitted.
METHODS: One hundred sixty-five assessable patients with LABC were treated in a prospective trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilizing four cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Responding patients were treated with segmental mastectomy and axillary dissection or modified radical mastectomy. Patients subsequently received additional chemotherapy followed by irradiation of the breast or chest wall and draining lymphatics. The median follow-up was 35 months.
RESULTS: Clinical tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.046) and the number of residual metastatic axillary lymph nodes found at axillary dissection (P = 0.05) were the only independent predictors of DFS. Patients with a complete clinical response had a predictably excellent DFS and those with no change or progressive disease had a poor DFS. In patients with a partial response, the number of residual metastatic lymph nodes further stratified patients with respect to DFS (P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical response and residual metastatic axillary lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy are important predictors of DFS. Patients with a clinically positive axilla following neoadjuvant chemotherapy should undergo axillary dissection to ensure local control. However, the benefit of axillary dissection in patients with a clinically negative axilla may be minimal if the axilla will be irradiated, and histologic staging does not affect subsequent systemic treatment. A prospective randomized trial of axillary dissection versus axillary radiotherapy in patients with a clinically negative axilla following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is presently under way to evaluate this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9926779     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00253-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  25 in total

Review 1.  Measuring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  The need for axillary dissection in patients with positive axillary sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Randal L Croshaw; Kathleen M Erb; Hilary M Shapiro-Wright; Thomas B Julian
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  H J Shin; H H Kim; J H Ahn; S-B Kim; K H Jung; G Gong; B H Son; S H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy does not apply to all axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wen-Kai Ge; Ben Yang; Wen-Shu Zuo; Gang Zheng; Ying-Qi Dai; Chao Han; Li Yang; Mei-Zhu Zheng
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  PET tumor metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: value of static versus kinetic measures of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake.

Authors:  Lisa K Dunnwald; Robert K Doot; Jennifer M Specht; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Robert B Livingston; Hannah M Linden; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Brenda F Kurland; Erin K Schubert; Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Factors influencing the outcome of breast cancer patients with 10 or more metastasized axillary lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jun Sang Lee; Seung Il Kim; So Young Choi; Hyung Seok Park; Jong Seok Lee; Seho Park; Jaseung Koo; Byeong-Woo Park; Kyong Sik Lee
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The role of chemotherapeutic drugs in the evaluation of breast tumour response to chemotherapy using serial FDG-PET.

Authors:  Michal E Schneider-Kolsky; Stewart Hart; Jane Fox; Peter Midolo; John Stuckey; Michael Hofman; Vinod Ganju
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 8.  Locally advanced breast cancer in developing countries: the place of surgery.

Authors:  Justus P Apffelstaedt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Tumor metabolism and blood flow changes by positron emission tomography: relation to survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa K Dunnwald; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Robert B Livingston; Hannah M Linden; Jennifer M Specht; Robert K Doot; Thomas J Lawton; William E Barlow; Brenda F Kurland; Erin K Schubert; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.