Literature DB >> 9926615

A comparison of power to detect a QTL in sib-pair data using multivariate phenotypes, mean phenotypes, and factor scores.

D I Boomsma1, C V Dolan.   

Abstract

The power to detect a quantitative trait locus (QTL) in sib-pair data is investigated. We assume that we have at our disposal 3 or 4 related phenotypic measures in a sample of sib-pairs. Individual differences in these phenotypes are due to a common QTL and specific (i.e., unique to each phenotype) nonshared environmental and specific polygenic additive effects. In addition, models are considered that include common nonshared environmental effects and/or common polygenic additive effects. We calculate the power to detect the QTL in a genetic covariance structure analysis of the multivariate data, of the mean phenotypic data, and of factor scores. The use of factor scores is shown to be universally more powerful than the use of multivariate or mean phenotypic data. We also investigate the effect of using a single sample of sib-pairs to both calculate the factor score regression matrix and to carry out the QTL analysis. The use of a single sample to both these ends results in a loss of power compared to the theoretical, expected power. The gain in power attributable to the use of factor scores, however, outweighs this observed loss in power. The advantages of using factor scores in selecting sib-pairs are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9926615     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021665501312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  17 in total

1.  Use of multivariate linkage analysis for dissection of a complex cognitive trait.

Authors:  Angela J Marlow; Simon E Fisher; Clyde Francks; I Laurence MacPhie; Stacey S Cherny; Alex J Richardson; Joel B Talcott; John F Stein; Anthony P Monaco; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Gene-environment interplay in alcoholism and other substance abuse disorders: expressions of heritability and factors influencing vulnerability.

Authors:  Tomas Palomo; R M Kostrzewa; R J Beninger; T Archer
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.911

3.  A framework for structural equation models in general pedigrees.

Authors:  Nathan J Morris; Robert C Elston; Catherine M Stein
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  The nature of schizotypy among multigenerational multiplex schizophrenia families.

Authors:  Sarah I Tarbox; Laura Almasy; Raquel E Gur; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Michael F Pogue-Geile
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-01-30

5.  Quantitative trait locus analysis of longitudinal quantitative trait data in complex pedigrees.

Authors:  Stuart Macgregor; Sara A Knott; Ian White; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Beyond the DSM: defining endophenotypes for genetic studies of substance abuse.

Authors:  Jon A Frederick; William G Iacono
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Variance components linkage analysis with repeated measurements.

Authors:  Liming Liang; Wei-Min Chen; Pak C Sham; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  A simulation study of the effects of assignment of prior identity-by-descent probabilities to unselected sib pairs, in covariance-structure modeling of a quantitative-trait locus.

Authors:  C V Dolan; D I Boomsma; M C Neale
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Reconsidering the asymptotic null distribution of likelihood ratio tests for genetic linkage in multivariate variance components models under complete pleiotropy.

Authors:  Summer S Han; Joseph T Chang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Notes on Three Decades of Methodology Workshops.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.