Literature DB >> 9926265

The Second Canadian Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Consensus: moving forward to new concepts.

A B Thomson1, N Chiba, D Armstrong, G Tougas, R H Hunt.   

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a disease with serious consequences that may result in significant impairment in quality of life and disease morbidity. Across all grades of severity of symptoms and severity of underlying esophageal disease, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provide therapeutic gains over prokinetics (PKs) or H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs). The potential cost effectiveness of using medications with higher acquisition costs that may lower health care costs overall is often disregarded when conducting cost comparisons with medications having lower 'up-front' costs. Limiting therapy to less effective agents condemns many patients to protracted suffering, repeated physician visits and needless reinvestigation of symptoms that could have been resolved by appropriate initial therapy. Based on current data, use of any classification of symptom severity as a basis for selecting one class of therapeutic agents over another for first line therapy (i.e. PKs, H2RAs for 'mild' GERD, versus a PPI for 'severe' disease) is unwarranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9926265     DOI: 10.1155/1998/925346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general practice.

Authors:  J Dent; R Jones; P Kahrilas; N J Talley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-10

2.  Impact of reference-based pricing for histamine-2 receptor antagonists and restricted access for proton pump inhibitors in British Columbia.

Authors:  John K Marshall; Paul V Grootendorst; Bernie J O'Brien; Lisa R Dolovich; Anne M Holbrook; Adrian R Levy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 8-week comparative trial of low-dose esomeprazole (20 mg) and standard-dose omeprazole (20 mg) in patients with erosive esophagitis.

Authors:  Charles J Lightdale; Colleen Schmitt; Clara Hwang; Bernard Hamelin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 8-week comparative trial of standard doses of esomeprazole (40 mg) and omeprazole (20 mg) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis.

Authors:  Colleen Schmitt; Charles J Lightdale; Clara Hwang; Bernard Hamelin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical features.

Authors:  Michael Pettit
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Efficiency of potent gastric acid inhibition.

Authors:  Fernando Carballo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Evidence for therapeutic equivalence of lansoprazole 30mg and esomeprazole 40mg in the treatment of erosive oesophagitis.

Authors:  Colin W Howden; E David Ballard; Weining Robieson
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 8.  Treatment of acid-related diseases in the elderly with emphasis on the use of proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Bjarni Thjodleifsson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.