Literature DB >> 9925954

Normal swallowing physiology as viewed by videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy.

J A Logemann1, A W Rademaker, B R Pauloski, Y Ohmae, P J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

This study examines normal oropharyngeal swallow physiology in 8 young adult males with concurrent videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy. Twelve swallows were examined for each subject, 3 swallows each of 1 and 5 ml of thin liquid at each of two endoscopic positions: (1) the tip of the endoscope just at or below the tip of the uvula (high position), and (2) the tip of the endoscope just below the tip of the epiglottis (low position). Results indicate that if the clinician is interested in laryngeal events occurring before and after swallow, videoendoscopy with the endoscope in the low position is the procedure of choice. To evaluate pharyngeal anatomy and/or the presence of food in the pharynx before or after swallow, either endoscopy with the endoscope in the high position or videofluoroscopy can be used. However, if the clinician is interested in pharyngeal physiology during swallow, videofluoroscopy is a better diagnostic procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9925954     DOI: 10.1159/000021473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop        ISSN: 1021-7762            Impact factor:   0.849


  36 in total

Review 1.  Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales Based on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paul D Neubauer; Denise P Hersey; Steven B Leder
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Evaluation of swallowing using 320-detector-row multislice CT. Part II: kinematic analysis of laryngeal closure during normal swallowing.

Authors:  Yoko Inamoto; Naoko Fujii; Eiichi Saitoh; Mikoto Baba; Sumiko Okada; Kazuhiro Katada; Yasunori Ozeki; Daisuke Kanamori; Jeffrey B Palmer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  A Comparison of Visual Recognition of the Laryngopharyngeal Structures Between High and Standard Frame Rate Videos of the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing.

Authors:  Mehran Alizadeh Aghdam; Makoto Ogawa; Toshihiko Iwahashi; Kiyohito Hosokawa; Chieri Kato; Hidenori Inohara
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Respiratory-swallowing coordination and swallowing safety in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Michelle S Troche; Irene Huebner; John C Rosenbek; Michael S Okun; Christine M Sapienza
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Displacement of oropharyngeal structures during suction-swallowing cycles.

Authors:  W Engelke; J Glombek; M Psychogios; S Schneider; D Ellenberger; P Santander
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Electromyography of swallowing with fine wire intramuscular electrodes in healthy human: activation sequence of selected hyoid muscles.

Authors:  Haruhi Inokuchi; Marlís González-Fernández; Koichiro Matsuo; Martin B Brodsky; Mitsumasa Yoda; Hiroshige Taniguchi; Hideto Okazaki; Takashi Hiraoka; Jeffrey B Palmer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Dysphagia in the elderly.

Authors:  Muhammad Aslam; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-12

8.  Validation and Reliability of the French Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire.

Authors:  Nicolas Audag; Christophe Goubau; Etienne Danse; Laure Vandervelde; Giuseppe Liistro; Michel Toussaint; Gregory Reychler
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Definition and implications of novel pharyngo-glottal reflex in human infants using concurrent manometry ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sudarshan R Jadcherla; Alankar Gupta; Mansen Wang; Brian D Coley; Soledad Fernandez; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Airway protective mechanisms.

Authors:  Teresa Pitts
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.